• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

IronBridge Private Wealth

Forward with Confidence

  • Home
  • Difference
  • Process
  • Services
  • Insights
    • IronBridge Insights
    • Strategic Wealth Blog
    • Strategic Growth Video Podcast
    • YouTube Channel
  • Team
  • Clients
  • Form CRS
  • Contact Us

Charting the Course: Four Possible Market Outcomes

March 9, 2018

In this issue we chart the four likely paths the market may take over the coming weeks and months, update our “Two Most Important Days” analysis, and look again at the weakness in High Yield Bonds.

[maxbutton id=”5″ url=”https://ironbridge360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/IronBridge-Insights-2018-03-09-Charting-the-Course-Four-Potential-Outcomes.pdf” text=”View PDF” ]


Executive Summary

Well, the “two most important days” has been stretched into “the two important weeks”, and it may even get stretched into the “two most important months”. We are approaching the one month anniversary since the markets bounced off their lows. Unfortunately, the market has little to show for it, except for a significant uptick in volatility. Since the initial rebound off the February lows, the market has been moving sideways, and essentially running in place the entire time.

Market Update

We update the S&P 500 chart from a few weeks ago and analyze recent market action.

  • The market is in a neutral position, with signals neither pointing strongly bullish nor strongly bearish.
  • False Breaks higher and lower keep near-term moves uncertain and risks high.

Stock Market

We identify the four most likely potential outcomes for the markets, and assign probabilities for each.

  • Expectation #1: New Lows (35% Probability)
  • Expectation #2: Headfake Higher then New Lows (30% Probability)
  • Expectation #3: New Highs, Volatility is Over (25% Probability)
  • Expectation #4: Sideways Consolidation for Weeks/Months, then New Highs (10% Probability)

Bond Market

We look again at high yield bonds, which continue to show signs of stress.

  • High Yield Bonds will often move in price before stocks, making it an important market to follow and analyze.
  • Recent price movements show the early signs of a longer term topping process.
  • Bearish activity in this market needs to be resolved in a more bullish fashion in order for stocks to make new highs.

Over the past week we have received new buy signals in our trend model and on select stocks (primarily technology stocks). We still remain with elevated cash positions in client portfolios, but less so that on our last update. Downside risks still remain elevated, and these new positions have very little tolerance for downside movements.


FIT Model Update: Market Correction

Some technical indicators have improved as the trauma of the quick pullback recedes (for now). Fundamental indicators have shown some signs of deterioration the past month as GDP, consumer spending, industrial production and housing statistics have all come in below expectations.

Currently, all three primary inputs are still flashing warning signs as we are, at a minimum, within a short term market correction, waiting for confirmation of the bottom. Overall conditions have improved somewhat during the past week, but structurally we still view this period as a time of elevated risk.


Market Insights

Mixed Signals

Well, the “two most important days” has been stretched into “the two important weeks”, and it may even get stretched into the “two most important months”. We are approaching the one month anniversary since the markets bounced off their lows. Unfortunately, the market has little to show for it, except for a significant uptick in volatility. Since the initial rebound off the February lows, the market has been moving sideways, and essentially running in place the entire time.

Update to the “Two Most Important Days”

Given the speed of the decline in early February, we anticipated that the markets would resolve themselves either higher or lower in a relatively quick manner. But, as markets like to do, they have a mind of their own and decided to stay out a little past curfew. The first chart below is the one we published on February 15th. The second chart is the updated chart through the morning of March 9th.

 

In February, we anticipated a tug of war around the 50-62% retracement level, followed by a fairly quick resolution. We indeed saw the tug of war around this level, but instead of a quick resolution, we have now seen two “headfakes”.  As shown in the March 9th chart above, the first headfake occurred with a break above this level, followed by an immediate return within these levels. This is a failed bullish signal, increasing odds of a break lower.

Then, the market gave us another headfake, but this time with a break LOWER from this area, followed by an immediate return into the retracement zone. This resulted in a failed BEARISH signal, increasing the odds of a break higher.

What this tells us is that the market currently has no dominating trend with many potential outcomes, both positive and negative. We discuss the four likely scenarios below.

 


Market Microscope

Four Possible Outcomes

“The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails.” – William Arthur Ward, American Writer

Stock Market

Now that we have recapped the past few weeks, let’s get to the more important job of looking forward. The market currently has more potential outcomes than any time in the past 3-5 years.

From a technical perspective, the strong uptrend since the February 2016 lows is being challenged. From a fundamental perspective, recent economic strength is also being challenged with various economic measures coming in lower than expected (GDP, housing, consumer spending and industrial production all had readings below expectations in the past month). The Federal Reserve is also beginning the process of shrinking their balance sheet, acting to slowly remove liquidity from markets.

Based on the readings of the many market signals we watch, as well as our deep study of previous market cycles, we anticipate there to be four primary outcomes we need to consider over the coming weeks and months.

Expectation #1: Sideways then New Lows (35% Probability)

The chart of the S&P 500 below reveals one of our two primary expectations of where the market may go right now. This is similar to what we expected in our last ‘Insights’. We put the odds of this scenario at 35%, but the total odds at 65% that the market ultimately moves below the initial panic selling from early February. A high probability for sure, but no sure thing by any means.

The chart below reveals how price today is essentially at the same levels it was at the time of our Feb 23 ‘Insights’. The market has now provided us new information, and a breakdown in price below the recent low at $2660 will shift those 35% odds higher, but for now we watch the tug of war occurring at this all-important retracement zone referenced in our “most important two days” interim report.

 

Expectation #2: Headfake Higher then New Lows (30% Probability)

The next chart below reveals our next best interpretation of what the market is preparing for us. This week we have seen some market strength, which has increased the odds somewhat of this potential playing out. That strength has also resulted in us increasing our equity exposure this week as new buy signals moved some cash off of the sidelines.

There is a popular saying “the market fools most of the people most of the time”, and expectation 2 would certainly satisfy that presumption.

Notice there is one common denominator in both of these first two scenarios. If the market falls below $2660, then it would significantly increase the odds we are heading toward new lows below $2500 on the S&P. $2660 is a key level we are watching and likely the next point in which we will further lighten our exposure to equities.

A decline below $2660 would help confirm that the sellers have won the tug of war of the last month. It also is likely a level a lot of traders are watching since it held price as support once already. In other words it could be a level where self-fulfilling prophecy takes over as sellers create more sellers which create more sellers, etc. If the 2nd scenario is what is occurring, we will get our first warning sign when price exceeds, but then falls back below $2780.

 

Expectation #3: New Highs, Volatility is Over (25% Probability)

The 3rd option must be given some benefit of the doubt, given how strong the market has been over the past two years, and further back since 2009. Although many technical indicators suggest another new price low must be made before a new all time high can be, absolute certainties are never an option in the financial markets and we are fully aware that bullish cases still exist.

ALERT: If you work for a large investment firm, don’t worry about the other scenarios because this is the only one that has been approved by your corporate attorneys, and the only scenario you can discuss with clients.

As many of you know we prefer not to guess where the market is headed, and instead allow price to guide us first and foremost. A price break above $2780 would help increase the odds we have seen a meaningful bottom.

The difference between Expectation 3 and Expectation 2 is what occurs after that $2780 is eventually exceeded. Will price eventually fall back down below that level which marks the upper end of the recent tug of war zone, or will bulls be able to hold the momentum into the Spring and Summer months, on to new all time highs?

 

Expectation #4: Sideways Consolidation, then New Highs (10% Probability)

Finally, the last real option is this tug of war continues for months before ultimately culminating in higher prices. If this scenario is playing out, we should not fall below February’s low.

We only give this setup a 10% chance because of how strong the initial down move was. If this were your typical sideways consolidation you would typically have had a lot of indecision on the way down, similar to how you have indecision now, on the way back up. That simply was not the case with the emphatic move lower, which keeps the odds low that this will drag on for months without conclusion.

If we take all the weighted cases we come up with a bearish expectation of 65% and a bullish one of 35%, which is roughly how we have our equities positioned currently (about 65% of our potential equity exposure is in cash).

Over the last 1.5 months our signals have had us exiting for various reasons, and seemingly with good cause as we have largely been on the sidelines during all this volatility. Some holdings were stopped out with 7%+ declines from their peaks. Other holdings were exited on Feb 5, just before the bulk of the first 1,000 point down day on the Dow. Other positions we have taken profits and redeployed.

We remain largely invested in our individual equity holdings; we just got a new buy signal in our trend model, and we are 50% exposed in our sector allocations.

Overall we are very pleased with the way our portfolio strategy has performed during this volatile period, and we are confident we are ready for whatever the market throws at us next, bearish or bullish. After all, it’s better to have a plan and not need it rather than to need a plan and not have one!


High Yield Bonds

Last ‘Insights’ we mentioned how we were also reeling in some of our credit exposure. The chart above points out some reasons why. High Yield bonds (also known as junk bonds) are typically those bonds that are one step above equity on a company’s balance sheet. They are usually last in the bond pecking order but just ahead of equities when it comes to liquidation preferences, which is why investors often require higher rates of interest when buying them. Because they are typically just one level better than equities they can be a pretty good proxy for equity behavior. This is also why some refer to high yield bonds as a good leading indicator for stocks. The chart above, of JNK, is an ETF that tracks the performance of a large basket of high yield debt.

Taking a look at the chart indeed it is true that high yield is a good proxy for equities, with a few peculiarities.

First, we can see that high yield debt also sold off from its January highs, similar to equities. But we have also added two vertical lines which help support the case that high yield can be a good leading indicator. Notice that JNK topped out around one month prior to equities, in early January?  Additionally its second, lower, peak in price came a few days before equity’s ultimate peak. Secondly, and one reason we remain more bearish than bullish right now, is on the right side of the chart.

If you remember the 5 rules of a topping process discussed in our October 27, 2017 issue, then you’ll remember that steps 1-3 are a rounded top formation, a breakdown in price below key indicators, and then a backtest, and ultimately, failure of that backtest at key price levels.

Taking a look back at the chart above indeed price has rallied back to the 200 day moving average, after breaking down below it, and has thus far been rejected. This is bearish activity until proven otherwise.

Invest wisely.


Our clients have unique and meaningful goals.

We help clients achieve those goals through forward-thinking portfolios, principled advice, a deep understanding of financial markets, and an innovative fee structure.

Contact us for a Consultation.

Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.  Disclaimer This presentation is for informational purposes only. All opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. > Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.

Filed Under: IronBridge Insights

Corrections are Not Healthy

February 23, 2018

In this issue we dig deeper into the possible market outcomes following the recent volatility, explain why market corrections are not healthy, and review portfolio changes and positioning.

[maxbutton id=”5″ url=”https://ironbridge360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IronBridge-Insights-2018-02-23.pdf” text=”View PDF” ]


Executive Summary

On Thursday, February 15, 2018 in our interim update we proclaimed “the next two days are the most important since 2016”. This is because the market was in the midst of a perfectly normal retracement in price after a swift selloff. The recent snap back rally was expected and is something that occurs after every big selloff, but what comes next in our opinion is the real key to the market’s intentions.

Historically, where price is today is where either counter-trend rallies failed and prices resumed their downtrend, or the market proved the selloff was over by powering higher through key moving averages and price levels.

Since that update, the market’s rally has continued to stall for more than a few days at its key moving averages as shown by the chart below and in more detail in our Market Microscope section. We continue to anxiously wait for the culmination of this perfectly normal counter-trend bounce as the time has come to “do or die”.

To us, nothing has been proven by the market, yet, other than the fact the short term trend of the market has indeed turned down. That fact will remain until price can regain its key moving averages, and ultimately make its next new all time high. In the meantime we remain with an elevated cash amount waiting for the market to nudge us one way or the other.

In our Portfolio Insights section we discuss the latest correction and challenge some of the popular terms, such as “healthy correction”. We also have started to reel in our fixed income holding’s credit risk. One thing we do know is that if the equity market is rolling over, so too will be the credit markets rolling over, and we are trying to get ahead of that curve, in case it too is on the horizon. The High Yield Bond market’s chart does not look healthy.


FIT Model Update: Market Correction

For the past seven months, our signals have almost exclusively been telling us that while the fundamentals and sentiment portions of our model were showing an over-valued and over-bought market, the technical indicators still showed strength. That has now changed with the recent 10% market pullback.

Currently, all three primary inputs are now flashing warning signs as we are, at a minimum, within a short term market correction, waiting for confirmation of the bottom. In a more worse case, at the beginning of a deeper bear market. Technical conditions can change quickly, and we are watching closely.


Market Microscope

The Market has Regained some of its Losses…Now What?

Stock Market

Below are a few recent examples of market pullbacks. On the first chart below is the 2015 minor market top, and on the next chart is the 2007 major market top. Both of these tops started out similarly, and also look, in their early stages, very much like the recent decline in the markets witnessed over the last few weeks. Other similarities of these tops include having rather swift initial sell-offs, “V Shaped” bottoms, and an initial bounce that ultimately tests moving averages and typical retracement levels.

In the case of 2015’s pullback, the initial selloff ultimately lead to a 14% drawdown from all time highs. Shortly after the initial “panic” selloff, stocks bounced, but they met resistance at the 20 day moving average (the initial red circle in the chart below). This led to another test of the low (initial green circle).

Ultimately stocks rose from there, but they still never made a new all time high. This resulted in the formation of a series of “lower highs”, which is one of two official components to a downtrend (the other being a series of “lower lows” accompanying the “lower highs”). Prices soon fell back below all the moving averages and again met resistance on the bounce, ultimately succumbing to the final low in the move. Not until a break and sustained move above the 20 and 50 day moving averages, and then ultimately the 200 day moving average, did the market prove it was resuming its uptrend.

 

The second chart above shows that 2007 saw a similar setup with an initially steep selloff (a very similar to today (-10%) decline), and subsequent bounce into typical retracement levels (50% to 61.8%). Similarly moving averages were tested, but price could not sustain above them (as shown in the blue circle). Ultimately a series of lower highs were formed that were never broken out of and price fell back through all the moving averages, setting up the initial warnings of the soon to come bear market.

The stock market is in a very similar and precarious situation right now, which is why we labeled two days recently, “the most important since 2016”. Will this selloff be like 2015/2016 and breakout above the moving averages? Or, will it remain below them, poised for a retest of its lows (and potentially more downside) like 2007?

This key binary decision point is why we continue to feel we are at an extremely important market juncture here.

Shown below, the market’s recent drawdown of 10.2% has now bounced 50% and into the same key moving averages that helped guide the way in 2007 and 2015. Thus far price has been rejected at these moving averages. If Price can move above the 50 and 20 day moving averages that would be a bullish signal. However, if it remains below them, it opens the door up for another retest of the early Feb lows, at a minimum.

The next chart shows one more example for us to look at, from the year 2000. That year also saw a swift drop from its highs, followed by a bounce in prices to around 50% and into the moving averages. Notice (in blue) that price failed to overtake the 50 day moving average, which resulted in more selling, a formation of lower highs and lower lows in price, and ultimately a 2.5 year bear market.


Portfolio Insight

“Healing is a matter of time, but sometimes also a matter of opportunity.”  – Hippocrates

Corrections are Not Healthy

It always amazes us to read the market commentary that gets recycled during different parts of the market cycle. One that we’ve read many times over the past few weeks is the ol’ “Corrections are Healthy” mantra.

There is nothing healthy about the destruction of capital.

The intentions are good by those who say this, and we understand the theory…the market has become frothy, and price declines serve to reset expectations, allow an overheated economy to cool, work off overbought conditions, allow inventories to reset, and/or value to better be found. This theory is similar to the Broken Window Fallacy, which we wrote about following the devastating hurricanes last fall (read it HERE).

But this theory neglects the real effects of market declines. One is very tangible: loss of capital. The other is more cerebral: increased uncertainty and the loss of “mental capital”. Markets and economic activity are performed by humans, and we are not rational beings at all times. (Washington DC continually reminds us of this fact.)

Mental capital includes the various behavioral finance issues that all investors experience. Once mental capital is fully expended, investors throw in the towel. This typically happens at the end of a long downtrend, which we refer to as “capitulation”, or panic selling.

Almost everyone has experienced this at some point, and if you haven’t, you probably haven’t been investing very long. It is the retiree who sold in March 2009, and is still waiting to get back in. It’s the tech investor who bought at the peak in the late 90’s and sold at the bottom in 2002. It’s the reason many people say “you can’t time the market”.

But managing risk is not about timing the market. It is about surveying probabilities. It is about investing in favorable times, and choosing to reduce risk when the odds of unfavorable times are increasing. The odds have increased that we are now entering into one of these potentially unfavorable times. Taking steps to manage risk helps protect both real and mental capital.

Portfolio Updates

We have made two primary shifts in portfolios over the past few weeks:

  1. Reduced Equity Exposure
  2. Increased Credit Quality in Fixed Income

As discussed in our interim updates and our last ‘Insights’, we have had multiple sell signals in our equity exposure in the past two weeks. We stress that this is likely to be a temporary allocation shift until our models give us new buy signals. But thus far, we have not received new buy signals in any of our equity strategies that we are monitoring daily.

Our buy signals are not designed to find the absolute bottom of a correction, as it is impossible to know at the moment an ultimate market low occurs. Our buy signals are designed to invest with the wind at our back. We want the probabilities of success to be in our favor. We believe this is our most important fiduciary duties to our clients. If we are risking our clients’ capital, we must have a reason to believe the odds are in our favor that we can generate positive returns. There is a popular saying in the trading circles that, “picking bottoms is for losers”, and we tend to agree.

On the surface, if may seem counter-intuitive that higher prices present better investment opportunities. But this is exactly the case in the current market environment. While the pullback was indeed violent, the internal market stats are not currently strong enough to create conditions in which our models say “buy”. So for now, the equity markets are in “no man’s land”, which we discussed in-depth in the Market Microscope section. We currently are waiting for the market to resolve itself either higher or lower. In the meantime, we will exercise prudence and patience with our clients’ hard-earned capital.

In a perfect world we would sell near the beginning of a downtrend and reinvest below the level that we initially sold out. In that case we would continue to outperform the market, and that is certainly one of our goals. There is risk that we ultimately re-buy at slightly higher prices (called whipsaw risk), losing some ground to the market, but that is a risk we are willing to take, especially when measured against the potential downside potential. Additionally we have other strategies in place with goals of offsetting this whipsaw risk. As our clients know, we have remained largely vested in our individual security names as well as some specific sectors, which have done well during this turbulence.

Fixed Income

Fixed income, on the other hand, continues to send a very clear message: rates are moving higher.

When investing in fixed income, there are essentially two types of risks investors can take: Interest Rate Risk, and Credit Risk. There are many other nuanced ways to measure risk, but these are the two big ones.

Interest Rate Risk means that an investment’s value will change due to a change in the absolute level of interest rates (source: Investopedia). More specifically, if interest rates rise the investment will lose value, and if interest rates decline it will gain in value. Longer-dated investments have more interest rate risk than those with shorter maturities.

We have been positioning clients for a rising rate environment for many months by focusing on investments with very short maturities. We have already been minimizing interest rate risk.

However, to generate higher yields, we had been taking on some credit risk. This is the risk we have addressed more recently as we have shifted some of our fixed income funds.

As shown in the chart above, high yield bonds (which we have tried to minimize ownership of) have declined along with the equity markets. The breakdown and retest of the support level over the past two years is a warning sign that credit risk may not be a risk worth taking any longer. In response, we have increased credit quality as another way to manage risk.

One final thought on fixed income. We discussed back in the January 11, 2018 issue as well as in our February 12, 2018 issue, how bonds and stocks actually tend to fall in price together during periods of stress. Notice how in the chart above HYG fell in price from its January highs to its February lows. High yield credit fell along with equities during this time, helping prove that diversification alone will not protect you from market selloffs.

If you are not our client, you should ask your advisor what your portfolio will look like if yields continue to rise and equities continue to fall?


Our clients have unique and meaningful goals.

We help clients achieve those goals through forward-thinking portfolios, principled advice, a deep understanding of financial markets, and an innovative fee structure.

Contact us for a Consultation.

Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.  Disclaimer This presentation is for informational purposes only. All opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. > Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.  

Filed Under: IronBridge Insights

Two Very Important Days

February 15, 2018

We believe the next 1-2 days are the most important that the market has experienced since 2016.  The market has had a strong bounce from the lows made last week, so we now focus our attention important levels in the markets to watch for next.


Now What?

Following last week’s strong decline in the markets, the past five days have shown positive price movement higher.

As we said last week, “Given the violent nature of this pullback, we would not be surprised to see snap-back rallies that are also equally strong.” We have now seen a strong snap-back rally.  The question is where do we go from here? It is impossible to know for sure, but let’s look at the levels we find important right now.

S&P 500 Index

We’re keeping this update brief, so let’s let the charts do the talking. The chart below of the most widely held US stock index fund shows a few important things:

  1. The 12% decline stopped at the 200-day moving average (200dMA) (blue line). This is a very common technical level that many market participants watch. It is simply the average price of the index over the past 200 days. It is not surprising to see a pullback stop here, and it was very positive that the market held this important level.
  2. Volume increased on the decline, but has fallen on the rebound. Granted, volume is not nearly as important as it used to be in market analysis, but we would prefer to see volume increasing as the market is rising. Declining volume is a sign that there is lack of conviction in the recent rise.
  3. The market has bounced to a key 50-62% retracement level. This means that the market rise this week has recouped just over half of the previous decline. This is also a very common technical level that many people (and computers) watch.

If the market can sustain a break above the 50-62% retracement level, chances start to greatly improve that the market volatility is behind us. However, if the market starts to move lower from this level, the likelihood rises dramatically that we see the market back near the lows of last week, and potentially lower.

Thus, we believe we are currently in the most important 1-2 days during this entire volatile time. In fact, it is likely the most important two days the market has had since early 2016.

We stress that we have both entry and exit signals in place for our clients, and we are not attempting to guess which way the market will go from here. Any new exposure to stocks we add for clients will subsequently have very tight stop losses here.

Fixed Income

The bond market continues to show signs of stress. In fact, bonds are underperforming stocks so far this year, and showed no positive movements during the selloff. We have discussed rising yields many times, but we continue to stress that the fixed income markets have risks today that have not been seen in almost four decades.

The chart below shows the ticker TLT, which is a fund that holds long-term US treasury bonds. The price has fallen 18% over the past year-and-a-half, as yields have moved above 3%.

Common wisdom would suggest that US Treasury Bonds would perform very well in an environment where stocks fell 12% in a week. The right side of the chart shows that there was no movement into these supposed safe havens.

Price breaking down here also suggests entering into a period of increased selling pressure on bonds, with a continued rising rate environment. We think this scenario is very likely.


Bottom Line

We are taking a prudent and disciplined approach to this period of volatility. We hope the market continues to move higher, and hope we get signals to increase client exposure to risk. But as we’ve said before, hope is not an investment strategy.

The next 1-2 days in the markets are critical to near-term performance, and we are watching very closely.

Disclaimer This presentation is for informational purposes only. All opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. > Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.

Filed Under: Special Report

It’s All Phil’s Fault & How to Invest Late in a Cycle

February 9, 2018

In this issue we discuss 6 Ways to Invest late in a market cycle, explore the past week’s volatility in more detail, and offer two explanations of why the markets fell so far so fast.

[maxbutton id=”5″ url=”https://ironbridge360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IronBridge-Insights-2018-02-09-1.pdf” text=”View PDF” ]


In This Issue:

MARKET RECAP: It’s All Phil’s Fault

Correlation is not causation. Just because things happen at the same time does not mean they are related. We look at two possible explanations for the market decline this past week.

PORTFOLIO Insights: 6 Ways to Invest when it’s Late in a Market Cycle

We review the characteristics of a market that is late in its cycle, and explain the six principles of investing during a late cycle environment.

MARKET MICROSCOPE: That Escalated Quickly

The VIX Index more than doubled in a 24 hour period causing some ETNs to actually close up shop. This rapid pace of the VIX’s move was unprecedented. Also, equities saw their biggest pullback since August of 2015 as one of our technical indicators has moved to a more conservative signal. Before all the fireworks we moved a portion of portfolios to cash, where it still sits.


On Our Radar

Trump Taxes: The tax bill has passed as companies continue to dissect how changes may affect them.

Earnings: 4Q Earnings season has begun, and companies have a high bar to continue the growth seen in 2017. GAAP Reported Earnings estimates for the full year have risen another $6 to $146.

Federal Reserve: The Fed is expected to raise rates 3 more times in 2018 as the bond market has already started to price this in.

Winter Olympics: The Winter Olympics kick off this weekend in South Korea.

Government Shutdown: The shutdown was avoided as a last minute signing of the latest bill occurred on Thursday 2/8/2018.

Economy: 4Q GDP rose by 2.6%, well below estimates above 3%.

Volatility: By some measures the recent bout of volatility was the most ever in such a rapid amount of time as the VIX spiked from under 20 to over 50 in a matter of hours during Monday’s (2/5) market slide. The increased volatility sent shockwaves across the markets. Still, it seems the VIX’s movements were exacerbated by the lopsidedness of the short trade as some estimates suggest that such a move higher in the VIX should have sent the S&P down 15%.


FIT Model Update: Uptrend with EARLY TOPPING PROCESS

Fundamental Overview: Although the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined over 10% from its peak to its trough during this latest decline, valuations are still very stretched. By most measures it would take a bear market decline (20%+) to bring valuations back in line with historical norms. One glaring example of this is the 5 Year Treasury Note’s yield of 2.5%. This typically safer investment is providing more income than the much riskier S&P 500’s 1.8% yield.

Investor Sentiment Overview: This week showed us one risk in being in a very crowded trade as the low volatility trade finally ended. The trade was so lopsided that a popular ETN used to short volatility literally blew up when Credit Suisse “terminated” its short volatility ETN (ticker: XIV) on Tuesday morning. So many investors had piled into the short volatility trade when the volatility index (VIX) rallied over 100% from the prior day, the ETN didn’t have the funds to cover its short positions, essentially bankrupting it. Essentially the short vol traders were caught in a massive short squeeze.

Technical Overview: Friday’s (2/2), Monday’s (2/5), and Thursday’s (2/8) crashes in stock prices essentially wiped out two months of gains as prices reversed back to late November levels. Our trend strategy and sector strategies gave us some sell signals as we increased our cash exposure this week.


Market Recap

The past week in the markets has been incredibly volatile, and as uncertain as any period since the 2008 financial crisis. There are many potential explanations of what cause the volatility over the past week. Some say it’s just inevitable, but we offer two possible explanations.

Maybe it’s all “Phil”s fault.

Last Friday, Punxsutawney Phil saw his shadow and the Dow fell 656 points. Then, following an Eagles Super Bowl win, the city of Philadelphia shut down to celebrate the victory and the Dow fell 1,175 points. To cap off a rocky week, Philadelphia again shut down for the Super Bowl parade on Thursday, while the Dow fell another 1,033 points. Thanks Phil.

We don’t mean to make light of markets falling so dramatically, but we point this out to highlight the importance that correlation is not causation. Just because things happen at the same time does not mean they are related.

Our Real Analysis of the Past Week

Based on our work examining the market behavior this week, we believe a series of things occurred:

  1. A Fragile Structure. The markets were very overextended from the record-low volatility over the past 6 months. This is a setup for a fragile market structure, as we have discussed previously. Low volatility increases risk, it does not reduce it.
  2. Liquidity was reduced. Record equity in-flows in January removed a large portion of potential liquidity for the markets. When selling started, there was a lack of buyers.
  3. Algorithms sold on Friday and Monday. There are many programmed trading funds across the globe. When they start to sell, it has the potential to create a self-fulfilling spiral. It starts with a large sell order in a thinly-traded market, which created a sell-order imbalance. Other computer programs see this and also enter sell orders. This makes sense to us, particularly when we noticed that volumes were normal levels (typically we would expect to see an increase in volume given such large declines).
  4. Risk Parity Funds sold on Thursday. There has been a dramatic rise of assets in what are called “Risk Parity Funds”. These funds target a specified level of risk. If risk rises, they must reduce their exposure. As risk declines, they increase exposure. As a result of the spike in volatility on Monday and Tuesday, there was anywhere between $200b and $400b of selling pressure from these types of funds.
  5. Key Technical Levels Provided Support and Resistance. This morning, the S&P 500 bounced off its 200-day-moving-average. This is the average price of the index over the past 200 days, and is a very closely watched level by portfolio managers. In fact, the S&P 500 tested its 20-dMA, 50-dMA and 200-dMA at some point during this week.
  6. Diversification Didn’t Work. As we explain below, almost every asset class was punished during the past week, as we have previously predicted.

Portfolio Insight

How to Invest Late in a Cycle

“There are two concepts we can hold on to with confidence: Rule No. 1: Most things will prove to be cyclical. Rule No. 2: Some of the greatest opportunities for gain and loss come when other people forget Rule No. 1” – Howard Marks, Investor

One of our persistent themes over the past few months has been discipline. We believe this is the most important trait that you as an investor, and us as wealth managers, must exercise when faced with late cycle investing.

First, what do we mean by “Late Cycle” investing?

Every market, whether it be in stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, currencies, etc, works in cycles. These cycles are not always predictable, and their turning points are definitely not predictable. However, it does not take a PhD in Economics to understand that a bull market that began 9 years ago is not in its early stages of expansion. Quite the opposite. In almost every measure that we watch, signs abound that we are late in the cycle.

The list below shows the broad characteristics of market cycles.

So what are the characteristics of a Late Cycle environment?

  • Economic Fundamentals are Strong. Fundamentals always look the best at the top, and the worst at the bottom. During the Tech Bubble in the late 1990s the underlying economic conditions were quite good. GDP had expanded for 9 consecutive years, as shown in the chart below.
  • Volatility is Low. More on this in the Market Microscope section below.
  • Valuations are High. Prices tend to rise faster than earnings late in market cycles, causing various valuation measures to increase. We see that today in P/E ratios being near all-time highs.
  • Optimism is High. The most consistent characteristic of market cycles appear in sentiment measures. Optimism is high near a market peak, and extremely low near market lows. This is easy to understand, as bull markets feel good and bear markets do not. No one likes to lose money.

How to Invest in a Late Cycle Environment

1. Shorten Your Time Frame (aka, Don’t Buy and Hold)

You should expect to own investments for a shorter period of time. The longer you hold an investment, the more likely it is that the next down cycle will occur while you own it. This means more careful screening of investments, and adhering to a strict exit strategy.

2. Reduce Your Tolerance for Downside Risk

Upside return potential is reduced late cycle. This doesn’t mean you can’t generate nice returns, but you must plan out strategies to get you adequate upside to compensate for your downside risk. We prefer a general 3-to-1 ratio: own investments with the potential to at least earn 3-times the upside versus the downside risk. So if we expect a 15% upside return potential, we want no more than 5% of downside risk.

3. It’s Okay to Miss Out on some Upside to Avoid Big Downside

One of the risks of late cycle investing is called getting “whipsawed”. This is where you own a position, get an exit signal, only to get another buy signal shortly afterward, resulting in a potential sell and then a soon after repurchase. In order to mitigate whipsaw risk it is important to structure exit and re-entry signals so that the potential loss is less than the potential loss of holding the position through the volatile periods.

4. Don’t Rely on Asset Allocation

We have mentioned this is many of our previous reports. Asset allocation does not work when markets undergo stress. And the past week has definitely shown stress in markets with the Dow Jones down 1000pts not one, but TWO days this week.

Here is the performance of various asset classes from peak to trough from their recent highs:

  • US Stocks (Large Cap, S&P 500): Down 11.82%
  • US Stocks (Small Cap, Russell 2000): Down 11.21%
  • International Stocks (EAFA Index): Down 12.58%
  • Emerging Market Stocks: Down 13.87%
  • Corporate Bonds: Down 5.47%
  • US Treasury Bonds: Down 8.08%
  • Gold: Down 4.16%
  • Oil: Down 9.6%
  • Bitcoin: Down 69.1%
  • Euro (Ticker:FXE): Down 2.6%
  • Emerging Market Sovereign Debt (Ticker: PCY): Down 6.4%
  • Mortgage Bonds (Ticker: MBG): Down 4.3%
  • Reits (Ticker:REIT): Down 13.3%
  • Manhattan, NYC Apartment Rental Costs: Down 3.6%
  • U.S. Dollar (Ticker: UUP): Up 2.4%

You get the picture. How well did a diversified portfolio prepare for and handle the downturn? Based on the numbers above, not well at all.

5. Don’t Listen to “Stay the Course” Advice.

The most common advice we hear from almost every major investment firm includes some combination of the following phrases: “Corrections are Inevitable”, “Stay the Course”, and “Markets Always Recover”. This advice is better than panicking, but it makes us wonder a few things.

For example, one of the country’s largest banks published a report to their institutional investors advising to sell stocks on January 30th. A subsidiary of this bank, one of the country’s largest investment firms, told clients to ride it out. There is a fundamental conflict with this advice.

We believe that most investment advisors do not understand how markets fundamentally work. Would you take your car to a repair shop that didn’t know how an engine worked? Yet, on LinkedIn we find article after article from advisors attempting to provide various reasons for the correction, but their conclusion is and always will be to “stay the course”. The irony is that this advice is exactly why investors panic as they lose confidence in their strategy.

6. Plan Investments within the Context of Your Overall Portfolio

Define your goals, define the overall structure of your portfolio, and design an investment methodology that fills the buckets.

Having a plan in place that reflects the cycle the market is currently in allows one to be fully prepared for weeks like the one we just had. Broad asset allocation may be sufficient during the early or middle stages of a cycle, but as we have seen the past week and exemplified in the example to the right where we have the last week’s performance across the world, it can fail you when you most need it during the late stages of a cycle.

As we mentioned in our Monday Special Report, “We have put in the work, so our clients can have peace of mind that we are taking every prudent step to address a variety of of potential market outcomes, good and bad”.


Market Microscope

That Escalated Quickly

One month ago we took a look at the extremely calm markets and one measurement of its serenity, volatility. In that issue we discussed the sleeping VIX. It seems Rip Van Winkle has awoken from his slumber! In that same issue we reiterated our stance that we were in a rising yield environment where we projected a 10 year Treasury approaching 3.0%. That has already come to fruition.

Late Cycle Investing:

A persistent theme over the past year has been the record low volatility. Back on August 11, 2017 we discussed this as we proclaimed, “a low VIX should not be something necessarily celebrated, but instead should be treated more as a red flag as market tops almost always are associated with periods of low volatility”. In addition charts were provided showing the record low volatility and the record amount of speculative short VIX contracts (which have now contributed to the extraordinary VIX move discussed in more detail below).

The chart below is similar to the one we provided in our January 12, 2018 ‘Insights’. In that issue we showed 4 prior times the VIX was near all time lows. 3 of those 4 preceded meaningful market pullbacks, and we now have a 5th occurrence, which also is in the process of marking a meaningful market pullback with the S&P and Dow falling over 10% from their highs. Low VIX levels are associated with market tops, not market bottoms. Similarly a low VIX is also associated with being late in the cycle, as the chart below helps show. Low VIX levels typically occur prior to market tops and market tops are by definition late in the market’s cycle, so a low VIX helps us confirm we are indeed late in the cycle.

But a low VIX also tells us more. A depressed VIX means volatility expectations are low, and thus tolerance for any elevated volatility should also be low. Contrastingly, in a high volatility environment larger price moves are expected, and thus should be tolerated more openly. We keep our tolerance for volatility low by keeping our stop losses and exit signals tighter than we would earlier in a cycle, when increased volatility expectations suggest allowing more tolerance for price moves. Those tighter stops have helped us move some portions of the portfolio to cash, ahead of a lot of the fireworks and whatever may be on the near horizon.

Volatility:

Well that escalated quickly! If you haven’t heard, this past week we witnessed an unprecedented move in volatility as the S&P 500’s Volatility Index (the VIX) skyrocketed over 100% in just one day. Not to get too technical but the VIX Index measures the underlying cost of volatility in an S&P 500 Index Option contract. In short it tracks the cost traders are willing to pay for volatility uncertainty, and on Monday that cost skyrocketed.

The chart below shows the recent history of the VIX along with the S&P 500 Index as well as a popular Exchange Traded Note (ETN) which allowed traders to participate on the short side of the VIX trade (owners profited when the VIX declined in price and lost when the VIX rallied in price).

The chart below shows that not once over the past year did the VIX close above the $18 level. That all changed on Monday, February 5, 2018 when the VIX more than doubled as the Dow Simultaneously fell over 1,000 points.

The move higher in the VIX was so unprecedented, that one exchange traded note (ETN), ticker: XIV, is having to liquidate whatever assets they have left as they couldn’t cover all the losses absorbed during the rout. For all intents and purposes the fund was caught in a massive short squeeze in the price of volatility which ultimately bankrupted them.

If there is a positive perspective to this story perhaps it is that the S&P was only down 7.5% from its peak to its trough since hitting its all time high two weeks ago. Some experts have suggested that similar moves higher in the VIX in the past would have sent the S&P down 15% or more.

The other silver lining is that our trend model gave us our first sell signal since August as we moved a portion of our portfolios to cash before most of the fireworks started. We remain with a somewhat elevated cash position as we continue to monitor the situation.

What this also means is volatility is likely here to stay, at least for a little while, as revealed on Thursday, February 8, 2018 when the Dow had its 2nd 1,000+ point drop in under one week. When extremely popular funds blow up, it can take some time for the dust to settle.

Stock Market:

Volatility has certainly picked up, but how much damage has actually been done to the markets?

The chart below shows the same chart as discussed in our update two weeks ago with the S&P 500 (in orange) along with the prior month’s average price (in purple).

The bottom indicator reveals the percentage distance price is away from its prior month average, and the takeaway from that discussion was that the market (at 6% above the prior month’s average price) had only been that stretched above its average price 9 times over the past 7 years with seven of those nine instances resulting in a flat to down market at some point within the next few months.

In other words, putting new money to work at those stretched prices had an elevated amount of risk associated with it. The market has since heeded to that historical precedent and indeed pulled back to levels that are now over 7% lower than January’s average price (and down 10% from the all time high). So, once again that signal turned out to be a beneficial one, and we are now in the midst of the market’s first meaningful pullback in almost two years. But does this mean the bull market is over?

The chart below reveals the longer terms have not yet been affected by the recent short term market gyrations. The short term trend has broken down after the 10% pullback in the markets, but the intermediate and longer term trends remain intact. This is why we remain with some equity exposure at this juncture. However, further deterioration in price would have us continue our trend of raising cash.

 


Bond Market:

Another persistent theme we have been following is the continued deterioration of the bond market. We first wrote about this expectation in our inaugural ‘Insights’, published July 13, 2017, and since then the bond market has seen a fairly swift move higher in yields (and lower in price).

The next chart is one we published in October with our projection of a move toward 3% on the 10 Year Treasury. Updated we see that the target yield discussed then has already been reached as the 10 Year moves toward the 3% level.

Remember a higher bond yield affects not just bond prices, but it also affects equities prices. If you are looking for yield, why would you buy the S&P 500 with a yield of just 1.75%, when you can get a safer Treasury Bond that pays above 2%?

The September 29, 2017 ‘Insights’ went more in depth as to how bond yields affect stock prices, but suffice it to say that a rising yield environment is not good for bonds, it is not good for stocks, and it is not good for commodities (which provide no return and actually cost money to carry).

Another reason to be concerned about rising bond yields is the chart below from the Federal Reserve.

There is a persistent thought on Wall Street that corporate balance sheets are “stronger than they have ever been”. But, this is simply not true.

The chart below shows that debt to non-financial corporations sits at an all time high approaching $14T. This means there is now $3T more in debt today on corporate balance sheets than there was preceding the financial crisis.

This may not be such a huge problem in a low interest rate environment, but as interest rates rise, these corporations will be refinancing at higher rates, increasing interest expense and lowering earnings.

The reality is corporations have used the low interest rate environment to essentially lever up their balance sheets, using the increased debt to buyback shares and fund other short term priorities. Eventually this will probably come back to haunt, after 5 years when their debt comes due, they don’t have the cash to pay it back, and they must refinance.

Or they just convince Philadelphia to keep working.

 

 


Our clients have unique and meaningful goals.

We help clients achieve those goals through forward-thinking portfolios, principled advice, a deep understanding of financial markets, and an innovative fee structure.

Contact us for a Consultation.

Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.  Disclaimer This presentation is for informational purposes only. All opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. > Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.  

Filed Under: IronBridge Insights

Special Report: Dow Jones Biggest Point Decline in History

February 5, 2018

The stock market has had a violent two-day selloff, resulting in the S&P 500 down 8.24% from the all-time high reached last week.  In this Special Report, we look at the reasons behind the selloff, what we have done in client portfolios, and what to expect next.


What Happened?

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 1,175 points today (the largest point decline in history), following a 665-point selloff on Friday.

So what drove this selloff?

First of all, stock markets are very complex systems, and there is usually no one “thing” that moves markets up or down. We have been watching various technical indicators that showed a stretched market that was vulnerable to a pullback. This is exactly what we are seeing now.

What is most surprising is how violent this move has been. We think these are the following reasons for the selloff:

  1. Overextended Market Conditions. Various measures we watch to understand the underlying health of the market were showing signs of a well-overdue pause in the strong uptrend from last year. We discuss these items in the next section below.
  2. Increased Computer Trading. There are many algorithms that participate in buying and selling of stocks, and this has led to an increase in the velocity of sell orders in the past decade. Once selling begins, it can snowball into increased selling across various markets.
  3. Political Risk. A new Fed chair was officially sworn in, and given the impact the Federal Reserve has had on asset prices in recent years, there could easily be profit taking on this news. Political uncertainties continue around various FBI investigations, and the tax cut has now become old news.
  4. Decreased Liquidity.  Almost every selloff in markets is driven by changes in liquidity.  What has been a fairly liquid market over the past year shows us that when liquidity is reduced, markets fall.

The chart above shows the Dow Jones Industrial Average since last summer. The massive selloff of the past week is reflected on the right of the chart. What was a calm, consistent move higher has changed rather dramatically.

There is an old saying the markets “Go up the stairs and down the elevator”. That certainly is the case right now.

It’s All About the Flow

Bottom line, market prices are ultimately about the amount of buyers and sellers in the market. We refer to this as asset flow.  There are very large investing groups in the markets whose strategies can move asset prices. One of these large investor types are called Risk Parity funds.

Goldman Sachs released a report today that discussed the potential for continued selling pressure over the next week due to these types of systematic trading funds. If their conclusion is correct, then small cap stocks and emerging market stocks may see the brunt of the selling pressure near term.

The past week has had a market with many more sellers than buyers. Fortunately, there has not been a dramatic increase in volume, suggesting that we are seeing a lack of buyers causing the markets to decline, not necessarily an increase in the amount of sellers. That doesn’t make the decline less painful, but is does suggest the selling pressure is not as bad as what the market declines show.


What Did We Do Today?

 

We adhere to a disciplined risk management process, designed to help our clients withstand these kinds of shocks through the use of our different investment strategies. Although the markets have seen major selling, our investment process has prepared us for how to handle this kind of move. Our process includes:

  • Aligning our clients’ investment portfolios with their individual goals. Do not take unnecessary risks.
  • Unlike most wealth managers, we are not afraid to move to cash to wait things out. We do this in an unemotional and disciplined way, only when our signals tell us to (see more about this in the paragraph below).
  • We have exit strategies in place on every position, so that we know when to get out and move on to something else.
  • We have been shifting our bond focus to funds that take better advantage of rising interest rates, and these funds have been mostly immune to the recent pullback.
  • We have re-entry signals in client portfolios, so that funds moved to the sidelines have a strategy to get back invested. This also includes clients with cash on the sidelines looking to invest.

Ok that’s nice, but what did we actually DO?

Today, we had sell signals occur in our proprietary trend model, and exited our S&P 500 index position for the first time since last August. The proceeds were moved to cash. We also had other sell signals trigger on various individual stock positions. On the whole, our clients had anywhere between 10% to 18% of their portfolio move from stocks to cash this morning, before much of the fireworks began this afternoon.

The last time our trend model had a sell signal was in August. This portion of client portfolios were in cash for 10 days before getting a re-entry signal. In our work doing back-testing of our strategies, this sell signal had times where it was in cash for months before having a new buy signal. Bottom line, we are going to listen to our signals and act accordingly.

Previous Steps Taken for Clients

It is not simply what we did today that is important. Over the past two months, our investment signals have consistently moved our clients stock exposure into large-cap US stocks, and out of the more aggressive areas of the market such as Small Caps and International stocks. The market has been giving signals to maintain exposure to stocks, but in the more conservative areas of the markets. We listened to these signals, acted upon them, and as a result our clients had very little to no exposure to international stocks and small caps, where the brunt of the selloff has happened.

Overall, we continue to monitor portfolios very closely many times throughout the day and have been taking steps to prepare for draw-downs such as today. We have exit and re-entry strategies in place, and we will execute our strategies with discipline.

Is the selloff over?

Honestly, we don’t know, but what we do know is we are prepared and ready for whatever the markets throw at us next. We list a few of the potential outcomes below.


What to Expect Next?

Every market selloff is slightly different. But we believe strongly that analyzing past markets will help give context as to what may be in store next.

We have written about this multiple times over the past few months. See our previous reports:

  • What Do Market Tops Look Like?
  • Have Investors Fallen Asleep at the Wheel?

What our analysis of previous market cycles reveal is that markets tend to undergo a longer-term process when forming major market tops. Maybe this time is different, but it usually isn’t.

What we expect is to see:

  • Continued volatility in the very near term as markets find their footing.
  • Given the violent nature of this pullback, we would not be surprised to see snap-back rallies that are also equally strong.
  • Increased uncertainty as investors nerves become more frayed.

We hope this is not the start of a larger bear market, and our analysis of previous cycles suggest it is not. But hope is not an investment strategy. We have put in the work so our clients can have peace of mind that we are taking every prudent step to address a variety potential market outcomes, good and bad.

Please let us know what questions you have. We welcome the dialogue and look forward to acting in your best interest.

 

 

Disclaimer This presentation is for informational purposes only. All opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. > Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.

Filed Under: Special Report

What Will be the Effects of the Tax Cut?

January 26, 2018

What will be the real effects of the new tax legislation?

In this issue we discuss what companies may do with the extra funds from the tax cut, look at the announcements made thus far, and take another look at the hot stock market.

[maxbutton id=”5″ url=”https://ironbridge360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/IronBridge-Insights-2018-01-26.pdf” text=”View PDF” ]


In This Issue:

PORTFOLIO Insights: What will Companies do with the Projected Tax Savings, and How will it Impact your Portfolio?

There are five likely ways corporations will use any savings from the tax reform. We discuss the most likely one in more depth.

MARKET MICROSCOPE: What is the Impact from the Tax Cut?

One persistent theme with the Trump tax cuts has been around the savings that will occur at the corporate level. No doubt there will be some savings, but how much really? One stat we have seen shows that of 25 companies that have reported their expected tax savings, those savings were 8.7%.

MARKET MICROSCOPE: US Stocks: To the Moon!

The stock market has been incredibly strong. The S&P 500’s hot start to the year, by one measurement, suggest a cool down over the next few months.


On Our Radar

Trump Taxes: The tax bill has passed as companies continue to dissect how changes may affect them. We take a deeper look at tax savings expectations in our Market Microscope.

Earnings: 4Q Earnings season has begun, and companies have a high bar to continue the growth seen in 2017.

Federal Reserve: The Fed is expected to raise rates 3 more times in 2018 as the bond market has already started to price this in.

Davos Economic Forum: The economic minds of the world met this week in Switzerland. One of their efforts is to coordinate global growth. President Trump’s more protective agendas have been a hot topic of discussion.

Government Shutdown: The government shutdown was a non-event and it likely will continue to be uneventful unless there is a more prolonged shutdown.

Economy: 4Q GDP rose by 2.6%, well below estimates above 3%. However, this is a preliminary number and will be revised in the near future.

January Barometer: Have you ever heard the saying, “so goes January, so goes the year”? This adage is a result of the statistical tendency for the full year market performance to follow the month of January’s. If January is positive, then typically the rest of the year was…at least until 1985. Since then the market’s full year performance has had little statistical correlation to how January performed.


FIT Model Update: Uptrend

Fundamental Overview: Many year end S&P price targets are already being hit as we expect the banks to readjust these targets higher. When prices rise quicker than earnings, P/E ratios also rise. This is what we are seeing today with a trailing 12 month price to earnings ratio (P/E) now above 25x, resulting in an earnings yield of 4% (E/P). With 5 Year Treasuries now pushing 2.5% it’s only a matter of time before a corporate bond yields more than its equity counterpart, flipping the reward to risk paradigm.

Investor Sentiment Overview: The latest sentiment measurement to join the club of extremity is the amount of leverage being used to buy equities. Rydex funds was one of the first mutual fund families to offer leveraged funds. The current ratio of leveraged long dollars to leveraged short dollars has gone parabolic, now almost 4x as much, and the largest spread in its history.

Technical Overview: The S&P 500 is up over 6% thus far in January, well above the average price paid of $2,658 in December. This is the farthest distance from the prior month’s average since March 2016. Back then returns one month later were positive, but 3 months later they were flat. Discussed in more detail in the Market Microscope, since 2009, 7 of the last 9 times the market was this stretched resulted in zero to negative gains at some point within the following 3 months.


Portfolio Insight

Tax Changes are Affecting Corporate Profits

“A conflict of interest may be defined as a set of conditions in which professional judgement of a primary interest, such as making decisions on the merits of legislation tends to be unduly influenced by a secondary interest, such as a personal financial gain” -Dennis Thomson, Brookings Institute

Corporate earnings are an important factor in the health of the economy and markets. How will the new tax law affect earnings and how should you factor this in to your investment portfolio?

At their core, markets are forward-looking. Professional investors aren’t as concerned with what has already happened as they are about what may happen in the future.

By definition, earnings are backward looking. The announcements we receive from companies give us their actual financial results for the previous quarter. Granted, most companies provide guidance as to what their best estimate of the next few quarters may hold, but many times this guidance is more of a cat-and-mouse game with analysts than true projections for coming quarters. This makes most earnings seasons relatively boring with little surprises.

This earnings season is different. There has not been corporate tax reform in a very long time.

We are not going to discuss the merits of this tax legislation from a societal, budgetary or political standpoint, but we are anxious to hear how it will impact the bottom line of various companies, industries and sectors.

We discuss this more in the Market Microscope section below, but so far, our initial analysis shows an increase in earnings of 8.7% for those 25 companies that have actually provided estimates of the direct impact from the tax cut. However, guess how much the S&P 500 has risen since the tax cut was passed? It has risen 8%!

The real question is….what will companies DO with this potential extra 8.7%?

In our view, companies are likely to do some combination of the following actions:

  • Stock Buybacks: This is when a company uses corporate funds to repurchase their own company shares. This can have a positive impact on stock prices by adding new “buyers” into the market (increased demand), as well as reducing the number of shares available to trade (reduced supply).
  • Special Dividends: These are one-time payments made to shareholders, typically initiated on the “suggestion” of the largest shareholders, and would likely be done by those companies that already have a relatively high dividend yield.
  • Mergers/Acquisitions: Companies may acquire smaller competitors to increase market share, or acquire strategic partners to allow entrance into a new market.
  • Capital Expenditures/Efficiency Improvements: Investment in labor-saving automation to reduce costs.
  • Employee Bonuses: Using extra funds to the benefit of employees.

While there have been companies announcing employee bonuses, they are likely doing so to generate positive publicity, and to help improve workplace morale. What employees get paid is driven by the marketplace for that particular position and what that employee’s responsibilities and skills can provide to an employer. Wages are not driven by the amount of free cash flow within a corporation, so we believe that wage growth due to tax policy is likely to be temporary.

Instead, the most likely use of that cash will be continued stock buybacks and increased dividends. In fact, companies have already been announcing increased buyback programs. So let’s take a look at how buybacks have affected markets in the past.

One of the most interesting aspects of stock buyback programs is that they tend to correlate very well with the stock market cycle.

The chart below shows the dollar amount of buybacks by S&P 500 companies in dark blue, the number of companies repurchasing shares in a lighter blue, and the S&P 500 in green.

Upon inspection, some interesting things appear.

First, both the number of companies repurchasing shares and the dollar amount of those repurchases tended to lag the performance of the S&P. In other words, share repurchases appear to follow the market, not be a leading indicator of future prices. This happens both when markets rise and when they fall.

Second, companies tend to buyback the most shares near market peaks while buying the least amount of shares near market bottoms. In other words, a higher market LEADS to increased buybacks, and a lower market LEADS to decreased buybacks. In some ways this makes sense, as economic downturns lead to reduced cash on corporate balance sheets. Corporations simply don’t have the cash to do buybacks. But, how do you explain the extreme amount of buybacks at the opposite end of the spectrum?

Why do companies buy back their most shares at their highest prices and valuations?

Notice the most share buybacks ever was in the 3Q of 2007, the exact same time as the top of the markets, and just before the average share price fell 50%+. This was the exact wrong time to buyback shares, yet CEOs and boards, etc did it anyways, to an extreme! They certainly weren’t putting shareholder dollars to good use then. It would have been better for them to pay attention to valuations and wait for a better buying opportunity, like in 2008 or 2009, when almost no company was doing buybacks.

There have also been periods where increased buybacks did not lead to higher stock prices. In the chart above, increased buybacks in 2011 did not result in a higher market. In fact, the market was flat for most of 2011 and 2012. Again in 2014 and 2015, increased share repurchases occurred when the market was flat to down. Conversely, the decrease in buybacks in both dollar value and number of companies in 2016 did not lead to lower markets. In fact, both 2016 and 2017 were excellent years for stocks. It appears to us that increased buybacks are something that happens in conjunction with prevailing market trends, not a leading indicator, but more of a confirming or lagging one.

So how should you factor in the tax changes into your portfolio?

Given how strong the market has been in the past few months, it may have already been priced into your portfolio. But as we get more clarity into which sectors and companies will benefit most from the tax changes the market will reward and punish as it sees fit. Instead of trying to predict what will happen with the tax law changes and how they affect the market’s prices, we have designed strategies to listen to these changes and adapt as necessary.

Near term, the trend of the market is higher, and will be until proven otherwise by a breakdown in its price, but as we discuss in our next section, the market is also very stretched and may be due to take a bit of a breather. That does not mean you should move to cash. It means you should have a strict risk management policy for your holdings and be prepared to take profits if and when the trends change.


Market Microscope

Higher Prices Due to Tax Cuts?

The recent changes to the tax code, specifically the corporate side, have received a lot of attention lately. The hype surrounding the changes, in some ways seems to be just that as we are not seeing that significant of a jump in 2018’s earnings expectations, at least not yet. It could be a case where companies are still trying to figure out the impacts, or it could be a case of companies with the good news simply barking the loudest.

Earnings & Taxes

Was December 2017’s 1.5% and January 2018’s 6%+ stock market returns driven by the passing of the tax code revisions? Perhaps. What about 2017’s full year S&P 19% return? Was such a great return a result of expected future tax savings for investors? That’s certainly a possibility, but unfortunately it is impossible to tell exactly why the market has rallied as it has, just as it is impossible to ever prove exactly why the market does what it does. However, what we can look into with a little more conviction is the amount of tax savings the market is expecting as a result of these revisions. If the tax savings are real then it is likely they are providing some benefit to the markets.

We received the following graphic from a research analyst that was proposing significant improvements in future company earnings, and rightly so. Thus far 25 of the 500 S&P companies have proclaimed they would see an 8.7% benefit to their bottom lines because of the tax law changes. If that holds across the board, an 8.7% jump in earnings would be great news for the market. But, that would require the 475 other companies to also raise their estimates.

The graphic hints at the reality of the situation. At least thus far, only a few of the 500 largest companies will see great benefit from the tax law changes, but 475 others either will not, don’t know yet, or aren’t communicating their expectations yet.

If we do the math, the graphic to the right equates to a weighted expected bump in Earnings per Share, or “EPS” of 1.6%, which is nice, but we would hardly consider it justified for the hype that has surrounded it.

The concern is the much anticipated tax revision in reality will benefit just a small percentage of the S&P while the rest see little real benefit (as depicted by the chart) and the 1.6% weighted average calculation.

It could also be a case of companies with good news barking the loudest (or soonest) while those companies with little (or negative) news remain mum. That may be a best case scenario as we wait to see if there are any more positive announcements, but thus far it seems the bang from the tax buck may not be as great as expected.

The next two graphics below show in detail what most already know; that the U.S. statutory tax rate is the high point on the scale, and most companies don’t pay near that rate. The U.S. Corporate tax rate did not used to be 35%, as implied. It actually was an average 29%.

The graphic below tracks the effective tax rate of the 500 largest companies through time. The effective rate in 2016 was already down to 29% (and trending lower), so at a maximum the tax savings would be at most 8% on average (29% less the new 21% rate).

The next graphic provides a little more detail around industry. Biotechs already had an effective tax rate of 20%, so it is likely they see little benefit as a group from the changes. REITS and energy related companies may end up paying more. Standard and Poor’s does a great job consolidating all the company earnings estimates from all of the projections made by analysts which are available every day on their website.

Standard & Poor’s data is updated as estimates change and actual earnings replace estimates. Today’s 2018 earnings estimates are highlighted in the final chart to show the full year estimate as of January 24 of GAAP earnings of $139.67.

The table to the right starts with what were October’s 2018 full year estimates, and then December’s, and finally today’s.

Today’s earnings estimate for 2018 is indeed higher than the $134.48 estimate on 12/7/2017, prior to the tax bill’s finalization. This equates to a 3.7% increase since the passing of the bill, and a 4.1% change since October, as it does look like earnings are getting some boost from the tax changes. How much of this is the actual result of taxes, it’s impossible to know for sure, but the jump in EPS does look at least partially driven by taxes. But just as important as earnings, price has been rising even faster than EPS, as highlighed in green.

The S&P is up 9.6% since early October. This suggests that even with the 4.1% boost in earnings, price remains well ahead of it, rallying faster than earnings, and continuing to push valuation ratios ever higher into the stratosphere.

EPS has grown 4.1% but prices have grown 9.6%, pushing forward P/E ratios up another 5.3% higher. The market is either baking in further earnings growth, or it is just continuing its “irrational” ways by largely ignoring fundamentals.


Stock Market

The chart below shows the S&P 500 (in orange) along with the prior month’s average price (in purple) since 2011. The bottom indicator reveals the percentage distance price is away from its prior month average. The indicator is a kind of momentum indicator that helps reveal overbought and oversold conditions.

Price as of 1/25/2018 is now 7.01% above December’s average price, and this is interesting because price being this far from the average has only occurred a few times since 2011.

Shown on the chart are vertical lines which reveal the prior times price rose 6% or more above the prior month’s average price. This has occurred 9 times during this timespan. What is interesting is what the market did following these readings.

7 out of 9 times the market made no positive ground or was lower at some point in the following three months. These occurrences are shown in green. The other two false signals resulted in 1) the market rallying for more than 3 months more, but then eventually pulling back to the price levels of the initial signal 6 months later. The other signal, in early 2013, was simply one that did not work.

Another takeaway from the chart is with prices now over 7% above their prior month’s average, today joins just 3 other occurrences in that same 7 year span (2011’s, 2015’s, and 2016’s). All three of these instances resulted in the market being flat to down from those levels at some point within the following 3 months.

So, what does it mean? It means the market is stretched here. It has probably run too far too fast and could succumb to the powers of mean reversion. It also does not necessarily mean a market decline is around the corner. Note this indicator reading >7% occurred prior to the largest pullback during the timespan, the late 2015 top that culminated with the 2016 low, but the market being more than 7% away from the prior month’s average price also occurred in 2011, resulting in just a small pullback of a few percent.

We remain bullish but are watching signals like this to help us apply rigor around when we allocate new capital to the markets. Blindly buying when the market is already 7% beyond its prior month’s average price has not been a historically great decision, so we don’t mind having some patience here and letting the market provide us a better reward to risk profile.


Our clients have unique and meaningful goals.

We help clients achieve those goals through forward-thinking portfolios, principled advice, a deep understanding of financial markets, and an innovative fee structure.

Contact us for a Consultation.

Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. \n *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, Ironbridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.   “,”m”:[{“s”:0,”n”:”c”,”v”:”#333333ff”,”e”:798},{“s”:0,”n”:”fc”,”v”:”Regular”,”e”:798},{“s”:0,”n”:”f”,”v”:”Arimo”,”e”:798},{“s”:0,”n”:”s”,”v”:9,”e”:798}]}”>Disclaimer This presentation is for informational purposes only. All opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. > Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.  

Filed Under: IronBridge Insights

The Slumber Issue: Investors Asleep at the Wheel, and Don’t Wake Up Rip Van Winkle

January 12, 2018

We’re not sure if it’s the cold weather, the post-holiday blues, or just too much Federal Reserve eggnog, but the markets are as calm now as at any point in history.

In this “Slumber Issue”, we wonder if investors are falling asleep at the wheel, do our best not to wake up Rip Van Winkle, and discuss an inconvenient truth about diversification.

[maxbutton id=”5″ url=”https://ironbridge360.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/IronBridge-Insights-2018-01-12.pdf” text=”View PDF” ]


In This Issue:

PORTFOLIO Insights: An Inconvenient Truth about Diversification

Are bonds and stocks inversely correlated? Most financial professionals will tell you that bonds provide safety to your portfolio during times of market stress; we disagree.

MACRO Insights: Have Investors Fallen Asleep at the Wheel?

The stock market’s volatility hit a new all time low as the market hit another all time high. Is low volatility something to be worried about or something that should be celebrated?

Market Microscope: Don’t Wake Up Yet, Rip Van Winkle

Today’s unprecedentedly low level of volatility has many market observers concerned. Indeed low volatility is a late cycle phenomenon, however, it does not necessarily mean a market top is just around the corner. There have been extended periods of low volatility in the past.


On Our Radar

Trump Taxes: The tax bill has passed as companies continue to dissect how changes may affect them. The theme should be one-time impairments from tax-deferred assets, along with plans for future stock buybacks and dividends. We should learn more about tax effects on companies during earnings season.

Great Start: The S&P 500 is off to its best start in 30 years…since 1987.

Earnings: 4Q Earnings season has begun, and companies have a high bar to continue the growth seen in 2017.

Federal Reserve: The Fed is expected to raise rates 3 more times in 2018 as the bond market has already started to price this in.


FIT Model Update: Uptrend

Fundamental Overview: Earnings season will begin in full force over the coming weeks. Retail will be in the spotlight after a good 4th quarter for many of those stocks’ prices.

Investor Sentiment Overview: Numerous surveys and other sentiment indicators continue to set records for stock market optimism. Adding to this growing list, the Investors Intelligence subscription service recently published the number of bullish advisors compared to bearish advisors has now hit 4.8:1. This marks the most bullish that cohort has been in 31 years.

Technical Overview: The market has kicked off one of the strongest starts ever as the S&P was up over 3% after the first 6 days of trading in 2018. The last time stocks started the year off this well was also 31 years ago.


Focus Chart

The VIX is Sleeping Like Rip Van Winkle

The VIX Index is a key measure of expected near-term volatility in stocks, based on the prices of certain options on the S&P 500 Index. A low reading is a sign that investors believe the risk of a near-term decline is low, and a high reading reflects the fear of a near-term market decline.

However, the VIX index, like other investor sentiment readings, tend to be contrarian signals. In other words, a low VIX is more reflective of a high point in stocks, while a high VIX typically accompanies a bottom.

The S&P 500’s measure of volatility has been hovering at or near record lows for the past six months. The monthly average of the VIX has now fallen below 10 for the first time ever, and this has many concerned. The chart below reveals the extremely low level of the VIX, and a low VIX has indeed typically coincided with stock market tops.

But, just because the VIX has made a new all time low, and the stock market has simultaneously made a new all time high, does not necessarily mean the stock market’s trend of low volatility and higher prices will soon end.

A deeper look at volatility reveals there have been four prior periods where volatility was behaving similarly. Two of those periods did indeed see market pullbacks shortly after, but the other two periods saw the equity markets continue higher for months and years before ultimately succumbing to a change in trend.

Until proven otherwise, volatility is showing more signs of a Rip Van Winkle continuing its slumber than a Sleeping Bear about to abruptly awake.

 


Portfolio Insight

An Inconvenient Truth about Diversification

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it.” – Upton Sinclair 

How long will this bull market last?

This is the single most common question we hear. It is not unsophisticated investors that ask us this either…this question comes up in almost every conversation we have, from very sophisticated investors to those would self-identify as not really understanding the markets.

This question is relevant. Not just for the obvious reason that we would love to know beforehand what will happen. It is relevant because it tells us that most investors are not confident in what they will do when the next downturn starts. It also reflects very poorly on an investment industry that has been selling diversification and asset allocation as the primary tool for “risk-management”.

There is a prevailing thought by investment firms that bonds and stocks move inversely to each other. It is from this belief that a diversified portfolio consists of an adequate amount of bonds coupled with an adequate amount of stocks.

But, there is a problem. Most money managers believe this to be true because they have only lived and invested during one macro trend. Since the early 1980’s, both stocks and bonds have been in long-term and tremendously strong bull markets. Historically, however, this is far from the norm.

The graphic below shows the relationship between stocks and bonds in three colors: 1) Red (periods of High Correlation), when stocks and bonds moved in the same direction; 2) Green (Anti-Correlation), time periods when stocks and bonds moved in opposite directions; and 3) Blue (Moderate Correlation), when stocks and bonds moved relatively in sync with each other.

Modern-day diversification is based on periods in Green. This happens a mere 11% of time! If this only occurs 11% of the time, then why is the prevailing thought of pie chart diversification so rampant on Wall Street? There are a few reasons, but one of them is also shown by the chart.

During the past 20 years there has been a flight to safety whenever stocks fell in price. In other words, there is a recency bias being played out.

In reality over 50% of the time there is a slight correlation, and 30% of the time there is a high, positive, correlation between stock prices and bond prices. In other words, when stocks fall bonds also fall.

There are many ways to manage risk in portfolios, but diversification is inadequate.

So what’s our answer to the question? I wish we knew when it will end. But we are not afraid to invest at these levels because we have already planned our exit strategies and know exactly what we will do for our clients when this bull market does change.


Macro Insight

Have Investors Fallen Asleep at the Wheel?

Suppose you are driving in a car on an interstate in a rural part of the country using cruise control set at 70 mph. Traffic is light, and you never have to touch your gas or your brake…until you start getting closer to the city.

Then your smooth ride is over. You certainly can no longer use your cruise control, and you likely must partake instead in white knuckle driving. There was zero volatility, now there is too much of it, and driving has become more dangerous.

The stock market currently is on cruise control going 70 mph in the rural part of the country and not having to bother with the gas or the brakes. But, too little volatility can also be dangerous. When you are able to just set the cruise control and sit back and relax while driving, it’s easy to get lulled to sleep, and if you have ever driven through West Texas then you have probably personally experienced this risk.

That is where we find ourselves in the market today, with the risk of being lulled to sleep, wondering how long that slumber may last.

Shown in the chart below with the blue line is the S&P 500’s volatility index ($VIX), inverted. It is inverted to align volatility with stock prices as the black line represents the S&P 500 during the same 30 year period. Notice that these two indices generally move in the same direction.

Currently, that blue line is at its highest level ever (the VIX is at its lowest level ever), which reveals the market has been driving on a rural road with its cruise control set for a very long time. Is the market now lulled to sleep by the lack of volatility?

The chart reveals a few key things which we will discuss in more detail in the Market Microscope section next:

  1. Volatility moves in cycles, and we are indeed late cycle.
  2. This low of volatility for this long is not the norm.
  3. Volatility is negatively correlated with the market. Lower volatility = higher markets
  4. Volatility can continue to fall, but the longer that occurs the less likely it continues. There is a zero bound.


Market Microscope

Don’t Wake up Yet, Rip Van Winkle

The VIX has hit an all time low, but how long can this low volatility persist? We look at a few indicators to help tell us when this bout of low volatility will be ending. The bond market also enjoyed relatively low volatility over the past few years, but that looks like it has now changed as more and more investors are noticing the change in trend in yields.

In the story of Rip Van Winkle, the title character goes to sleep after a game of bowling and heavy drinking with a merry band of dwarves. He falls asleep, and awakens 20 years later an old man, only to realize that things had changed dramatically when he awoke.

A look at volatility in the stock market over the past 6 months shows that risk is taking a nice long slumber as well.

The VIX Index is a key measure of expected near-term volatility in stocks, based on the prices of certain options on the S&P 500 Index. A low reading is a sign that investors believe the risk of a near-term decline is low, and a high reading reflects the fear of a near-term market decline.

However, the VIX index, like other investor sentiment readings, tend to be contrarian signals. In other words, a low VIX is more reflective of a high point in stocks, while a high VIX typically accompanies a bottom.

A further detailed look at volatility, below, reveals that the current low level of volatility is indeed not the norm. This monthly chart of the inverted VIX also shows the VIX fell below $10 recently. In the early 90’s, the mid-90’s, and in 2006, the VIX approached single digits, but it never quite got there.

Indeed today we are at a historical extreme when it comes to volatility. This new low for volatility could suggest we are due a mean reversion and that the VIX may be more a sleeping bear very close to waking rather than a Rip Van Winkle that will continue to enjoy its nice slumber. We believe this to be a shortsighted conclusion, however.

The VIX may be in single digits, and it may seem that it has been muted for a very long time, but in reality, the 2nd half of the chart reveals some intricacies of this VIX decline are actually not unprecedented.

(Graphic Content Warning: the following few paragraphs get in the investment weeds, but there is more to the report afterwards so stay with us)

The middle section of the above graphic reveals the “Average True Range” (ATR) which is a measure of the average monthly high to low range for the prior 12 months. In a lot of ways it shows us the “volatility of volatility”.

The ATR measurement reveals the prior 12 months VIX has had an average “range” of 6.1 points. This is low, but, interestingly, this is not the lowest that range has been.

There have been extended periods where the VIX’s ATR has been below 6 points, as highlighted in green. During these periods, the volatility of volatility was even lower than it is today. But we also see that during those highlighted green sections when the ATR was below 6, the VIX was at or very near its low price for the cycle. There indeed had been very little further decline in volatility once the ATR reached 6 as the start of each green section was at or near the low in the VIX, but that didn’t mean stock prices started to fall.

When we look at what followed the dates that the ATR fell below 6, we gain a little more insight. The first occurrence preceded the 1994 market 10%+ pullback, so it was a pretty good signal that a market top was near.

The second occurrence, however, occurred in the midst of the tech bubble, from 1994 – 1997, which ultimately lead to 1998’s pullback, but the low ATR lasted for 3 years prior to that outcome. The VIX was low, and it started to move higher, but at a slow enough pace to keep the ATR below 6 for 3 years.

During the mid-2000’s the volatility of volatility also stayed below the 6 level. This reading lasted for two years, before volatility started to pick up again in 2006. More recently, in 2014, the ATR of the VIX approached 6 and volatility immediately reversed, coinciding with the last meaningful pullback we have seen, 2015’s.

With a current ATR reading of 6.1, we are approaching that level again. However, given we have two examples of the VIX’s ATR falling below 6, and staying there for months/years, we should not look at the VIX here and its ATR at 6 and assume we are witnessing a market top, like, for instance, in 2015.

As history teaches us, we could continue in this low volatility environment for awhile, or, like the tech bubble, we could actually see a bottom in the VIX, yet see the market and the VIX both rise together for a few more months/years.

Finally, the bottom part of the chart is another measure of volatility’s volatility. The 12 month rate of change (ROC) measures the price today with the price from 12 months ago. Before the VIX bottoms and starts to move higher, its 12 month rate of change typically starts to also move higher. More importantly, though, the large spikes in the ROC that occurred along with large spikes in the VIX only happened after the ROC had been slowly moving higher. In other words large spikes in the VIX didn’t just happen overnight; there was a building up of the VIX prior.

What history teaches us is we should not expect a massive monthly VIX spike to occur out of nowhere. We should first start to see a gradual pick up in overall volatility by first seeing the ROC continue to steadily move higher. This could be combined with an ATR that moves back above the 6 points level. That’s when historically large prolonged spikes higher in the VIX and larger selloffs in stocks have occurred.


Penny Stocks

Ultimately, a low VIX is a sign of investor complacency. A different way to look at this complacency is to look at trading volumes in the most aggressive areas of the market. Historically, penny stocks (or stocks that trade for under $5/share, and not on one of the major stock exchanges), have been the place where investors have gone to “hit a home run”.

During the late 1990’s tech bubble, speculators were being fined for spreading false rumors in America Online chat rooms about virtually unknown penny stocks. Jonathan Lebed was one of them. He was 15 years old, and was charged with security manipulation by the SEC.

But, whatever happened to penny stocks? The only ones today that garner any attention are those like the Long Island Iced Tea company, which, after a name change to Long Blockchain Corp, is now supposedly in the Bitcoin mining business.

Or, Kodak (remember the camera company?) which quadrupled its stock price from $3 to over $13 when its management suggested they would use crypto as a tool to help manage digital property rights. Kodak’s recent price spike is shown below.

But beyond the Bitcoin mania, today we largely hear nothing about penny stocks. Like volatility, today’s lull in penny stock activity is unprecedented.

The next chart reveals a virtual standstill over the past two years in the dollar volume traded in penny stocks. Penny stocks historically have been the bastion of speculative pride, where the gutsiest of speculators could strike it rich, but today it seems that cohort has either disappeared or moved on to other means of speculation (Bitcoin perhaps?). Compare today’s dollar volume, under $50MM/month, to the late ’90’s $25B+/month. Volatility in penny stocks is virtually non-existent.

For all intents and purposes, the penny stock market has dried up, helping confirm the extremely low volatility in the broader market as even the most speculative of speculators are seemingly taking it easy.


Bond Market

We have discussed the coming rise in bond yields numerous times over the past year, and this past week that thesis started gaining attention from some of the better known bond fund managers.

Bill Gross, of Janus, was one of them as he utilized a similar chart to the one we provided in our 2018 Outlook and is updated below to proclaim that the bond bull market of the past 35 years “is over”. He also published his latest musings where he is calling for a “0-1%” annual return on bonds for the foreseeable future. Can you imagine a world where bonds return 1% or less and stock prices are also declining?

We can, and we are fully preparing for such an environment when, unfortunately, the traditional “pie chart” diversification fails investors when they need it most. Many investors are going to get a wake up call when they realize the bond portion of their portfolio is not providing them the diversification they thought they had. The Portfolio Insights section of this update provides a great analysis showing just how little bonds do protect when stocks decline.

 

Recent examples of rising bond prices during stock market selloffs are the exception more so than the norm, and our 9/29/17 IronBridge Insights also laid out why this has to be the case economically. As interest rates rise, the cost of capital also rises, and when the cost of capital rises, equity prices must come down, representing a fundamental rule of finance of falling bond prices and falling equity prices.

One way to mitigate the risk of a rising rate and falling bond price environment is instead of owning bonds that have fixed rates, own floating rate bonds, which will return more yield as rates rise. This is similar to also owning floating rate CDs and shorter duration Treasuries that you can then re-roll into higher rates as the overall rate environment rises. Could you imagine being locked into a 2% 10 Year Treasury bond if the 10 year Treasury yield is at 6% in two years? That’s a very real possibility that we would prefer to avoid.

With the 10 Year now creeping toward its 2017 highs, and the mainstream media now talking about the end to the bond bull it is likely we are nearing a short term pause in the move higher in yields. However, we expect the longer-term trend in bond yields to remain up and are looking at any rallies in bonds as ones to be sold. 3% on the 10 Year remains a good short term target in 2018 as the technical chart above suggests.

We hope the move higher in yields remains a calm and measured one. We also hope risk’s Rip Van Winkle slumber continues for a while longer.


Our clients have unique and meaningful goals.

We help clients achieve those goals through forward-thinking portfolios, principled advice, a deep understanding of financial markets, and an innovative fee structure.

Contact us for a Consultation.

Disclaimer This presentation is for informational purposes only. All opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. > Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. The investments and investment strategies identified herein may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment will depend upon an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. *The information contained herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. However, IronBridge does not independently verify the accuracy of this information and makes no representations as to its accuracy or completeness.  

Filed Under: IronBridge Insights

2018 Outlook

December 21, 2017

It’s that time of year again…the talking heads and ivory tower financial geniuses all disguise their wild guesses as well thought out analysis as to where markets will be at the end of next year.

Without question, there is value in thinking deeply about where markets may be headed. However, we believe that an effective outlook report helps identify potential catalysts that could change the direction of various markets, not a platform for a current day Nostradamus.

In this report, you won’t find specific projections on where the markets will be 12 months from now. (Spoiler alert…nobody knows).

What you will find is a collection of what we believe to be the most important characteristics of the current environment that have the highest potential to give us clues on what may be in store for 2018.

We hope you enjoy our Outlook Report, and welcome your feedback and discussion.

We also hope you and your loved ones have a safe and joyous holiday season, and a very prosperous 2018!

[maxbutton id=”5″ url=”https://ironbridge360.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/IronBridge-2018-Outlook-1.pdf” text=”2018 Outlook Report” ]

 

Filed Under: IronBridge Insights, Market Commentary, Special Report

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

LET'S CONNECT

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

AUSTIN LOCATION

6420 Bee Caves Rd, Suite 201

Austin, Texas 78746

DISCLOSURES

Form ADV  |  Privacy Policy  |  Website Disclosures

  • Home
  • Difference
  • Process
  • Services
  • Insights
  • Team
  • Clients
  • Form CRS
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2017-Present by IronBridge Private Wealth, LLC. All rights reserved.