IronBridge Private Wealth

Forward with Confidence

interest rates

Et Tu Brute

In Shakespeare’s famous play “Julius Caesar”, a group of conspirators gather in the Roman Senate to assassinate the emperor.

Brutus was one of Caesar’s most trusted confidants.

He and the other murderers pull their swords and stabbed him to death on the Senate floor.

With his dying breath, Caesar looks on in shock and betrayal and utters the words “Et tu Brute”.

Across the country today, regional bank CEOs must feel the same betrayal.

Yesterday, the Federal Reserve raised rates an additional 0.25%.

The Federal Reserve is supposed to be the banking system’s most adamant supporter.

After all, their primary job is “financial stability”, and they are considered the “lender of last resort”.

Yet, they inexplicably betrayed the entire banking system with another unnecessary rate hike.

In the midst of an obvious banking crisis, Chairman Powell referred to the banking system as “secure and resilient”. In the past month, we’ve had 3 of the 4 largest bank failures in history. Ah yes, the epitome of strength and resilience for sure.

The primary problem in the banking system right now are deposit rates versus safe alternatives.

This banking crisis is NOT over by any means.

In fact, risks right now are higher than we’ve ever seen them.

Let’s look at the Fed, Regional Banks and the Commercial Real Estate market to assess risks.

The Fed’s Last Hike

In their meeting yesterday, the Fed left the door open to additional interest rate hikes.

Let’s be clear. We believe there is NO REASON for the Fed to hike again.  Whether they will or not is anyone’s guess.

They have yet to explicitly acknowledge it, but inflation is no longer the problem.

They are fighting a banking crisis that it nowhere close to being over.

Instead of pausing, Chairman Powell felt he had to project confidence in the financial system.

He was faced with a difficult choice:

  • Don’t raise rates, and risk markets interpreting that as fear over the health of the banking sector;
  • Raise rates, but risk making the banking crisis worse.

Powell woke up and chose violence.

In the world of instant public relations campaigns, not raising rates would have been an admission that the financial system has major problems.

Even if the system is weak, they can’t let the market perceive that they think the system is weak.

But if they raise rates (like they did), they all but guarantee more stress on the banking system by boosting rates on money markets, increasing the risk of deposit flight.

And if banks try to raise rates to slow the deposit outflow, they destroy any profitability they had.

In the end, the Fed decided to roll the dice and increase rates again.

Unfortunately, this will likely prove to be an incredibly poor decision.

In fact, markets are now pricing in a 15% likelihood that the Fed will CUT rates at their meeting in June. Not next year, but next month.

The chart below shows the implied Fed Funds rate through January of 2024.

The blue line (and left side of the chart) is the expected interest rate on the date along the x-axis. The orange bars (along the right side of the chart) is the number of expected cuts by next January.

Fed Funds implied interest rate for the remainder of 2023. Number of rate cuts and projected interest rate decreases.

Markets expect 4.5 interest rate cuts this year, and the rate to go from 5.25% down to 3.9%.

This is quite extraordinary given that the Fed raised rates YESTERDAY.

It firmly implies that markets think the Fed made a huge mistake with this recent hike and that the economy is about to be very bad.

Let’s turn our attention to the regional banks next.

Regional Banks

Regional bank stocks are suffering massively.

3 of the 4 largest bank failures in history have occurred in the past month, and there are more to come, likely this weekend with Pac-West Bank. It won’t be the last.

The next chart shows the ticker KRE, which is an ETF comprised of regional banks.

Regional bank stocks are down almost 60% since their highs last year.

They have also have given up ten years of gains. This is simply astonishing.

What this tells us is that the market thinks the banking crisis is much more urgent and important than inflation.

We agree.

Commercial Real Estate

Economic data is weakening. Fast.

Bank lending is one of the biggest contributions to economic growth. We live in a time where loans are the backbone of the US economic engine.

There has been more than $2 trillion of outflows from smaller banks over the past month.

If you are a bank CEO, do you think you would be aggressively handing out loans right now?

No.

You’re keeping all the reserves you can, hoping your customer base is loyal.

Lending standards were tightening before the banking crisis began. Now that it is accelerating, the problems will begin to spread.

The biggest area of concern for us is in commercial real estate.

Let’s look at some stats:

  • 67% of all commercial real estate loans were made by smaller banks.
  • 83% of all CRE loans are balloon notes. This means they mature and the owner is forced to do something (refinance or sell the property).

In the next two years, over $300 billion of CRE loans mature, as shown in the chart below from CRED IQ.

We must keep in mind that commercial real estate is a diverse market, and not all properties are created equal.

There are some areas of strength:

  • Manufacturing facilities are moving back to the U.S. from overseas, creating support for industrial space.
  • Grocery-anchored shopping centers (with an HEB for example) are doing quite well.
  • Senior-housing facilities are poised to benefit from aging demographics.

But these are relatively small areas in the CRE market.

Currently, these smaller and mid-size banks are dealing with a liquidity crisis.

They may start to face problems with their balance sheet. This would be an entirely different ballgame.

Bottom Line

Risks are incredibly high right now.

Despite that, markets have been relatively calm.

The next few months are perhaps the most important months of the past decade.

If we can get through them with relatively little damage from an economic and earnings standpoint, there is a chance that we avoid some very bad scenarios.

Until then, it is appropriate to err on the side of caution.

IronBridge clients continue to be extremely below their target risk, with elevated holdings in cash equivalents and various short-term high-quality fixed income holdings.

We anticipate that will continue, but as always we will continue to monitor markets for signals to add risk where appropriate.

Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions.

Invest wisely!

Bank Run: Silicon Valley Bank Goes Under

Today, Silicon Valley Bank became the second largest bank failure in US history. What happened and what does it mean going forward?

Who is Silicon Valley Bank?

  • Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, was the 16th largest bank in the US.
  • This was the second largest bank failure in US history.
  • Based in Santa Clara, California, they focused on startups, founders and private equity investors.
  • Frankly, this was a great bank with fantastic employees, seemingly well capitalized, that went under incredibly quickly. So what happened?

How did SVB get into this Situation?

In order to fully understand the events that transpired this week, we first need to look at the past few years.

The roots of their collapse started in 2021. Their deposit base jumped from $61 billion at the end of 2019 to $189 billion at the end of 2021.

When banks bring in deposits, they have to do something with them.

Like all banks, the goal is to lend the money out, and earn profits by charging higher interest rates on loans than what they pay on deposits. This difference is called “Net Interest Margin”, or NIM. Banks charge you 6% on a loan, and they pay you 0.5% on your cash. Voila, they earn 5.5% in NIM.

Because their deposit base grew so quickly, they couldn’t underwrite enough loans to put that money to work. In order for them to earn a higher yield on their customers’ deposits, they purchased over $80 billion worth of Mortgage Backed Securities, or MBS. These are financial instruments similar to bonds that are made of up of many different mortgages.

97% of the MBS they purchased had maturities of longer than 10 years. These were purchased before interest rates began to increase last year. (This is important.)

Why did they Go Under?

When banks buy securities with customer deposits, they have to put them in one of two buckets: 1) Available-for-Sale, or 2) Hold-to-Maturity.

Available-for-Sale assets must be “marked-to-market”. This simply means they report the current market value of each investment they hold, just like you see on your investment statements each month.

Hold-to-Maturity securities, on the other hand, don’t have to be reported that way. If you bought your house for a million dollars, and the value fell, you could still report the value as a million dollars.

The $80 billion of MBS were held in the Hold-to-Maturity bucket.

Last year, when interest rates rose so dramatically, the value of these securities fell. A lot. They lost billions of dollars. And because SVB had longer-maturity securities, they fell more that shorter-duration ones would have.

This week, they had to sell at least $21 billion of assets to meet withdrawal requests after depositors essentially made a run on the bank.

Once Hold-to-Maturity assets are sold, any gains or losses must be disclosed and reported. The sells they had to make this week resulted in a nearly $2 billion loss.

Between the MBS losses and continued customer withdrawals, the bank was forced into receivership by the FDIC.

What Does it Mean for You?

First, recognize what a bank deposit really is. Banks do not have a safe where they keep your money.

The following clip from “It’s a Wonderful Life” perfectly exemplifies what really happens when depositors want to withdraw money from a bank. (Fast forward to 3:50 in the clip to view the most relevant part.)

Banks don’t keep your funds. They lend them out, and invest it, and do other things to make themselves a profit.

As George Bailey says, “You’re money is not here.”

Why do you think the new account agreement is so big when you open a new checking or savings account?

You are not an account owner of a bank account. You are a bank creditor.

You lend the bank your money.

They do with it what they want.

Now that people can earn a decent yield on short-term cash funds and US Treasuries, there is competition for those deposits.

This is a good reminder to pay attention to your deposits, especially now that there are good alternatives.

Is there Risk of Contagion?

Quite frankly, yes there is.

That doesn’t mean that other banks will definitely go under, but it is absolutely possible.

Smaller and regional banks are most at risk right now, but there is also risk to the broader markets.

We have long been saying that risks are incredibly elevated right now. This is a good example of what can happen when risks are high. Banks don’t tend to fail in bull markets.

In our opinion, the full effects of higher interest rates have not been felt yet.

This is a major example of the unintended consequences that can happen in a complex system like financial markets.

Portfolio Implications

IronBridge clients continue to be very underweight risk exposure right now.

We believe that risks will remain elevated at least through this summer, and you should position your portfolio for continued volatility.

We discussed the two most likely scenarios in our recent video from last week.

We further reduced risk this week for clients, and view any rallies attempts in markets as good opportunities to de-risk even further.

It is much better to not participate in short-term rallies than to participate in long-term declines.

As always, let us know if you have any questions.

Invest wisely!

Thanksgiving Appetizer Report

Fall theme charcuterie board for holiday entertaining

Just wanted to provide a quick update as everyone prepares for the holiday week. We’ll send out a more detailed report next week.

Big Picture

  • Markets have remained calm after the massive gain two weeks ago following a milder than expected inflation number.
  • Earnings for the most part have been better than feared.
  • Markets are entering a seasonally strong period. From the Tuesday before Thanksgiving thru January 2nd, markets are up on average 79% of the time, averaging a 2.7% gain.  This is what is commonly known as the “Santa Rally”.
  • Despite these positives, many
    warning signs still exist: leading economic indicators are weak, overall
    financial conditions are deteriorating, and the housing market is under
    stress. These conditions have not shown up in economic numbers (yet).

Economy

  • The good news: Economic activity remains resilient. GDP was up 2.6% in the 3rd quarter. 4th quarter GDP, according to GDPNow, is tracking up 4.2%. View it HERE.
  • The bad news: Leading economic activity is at recessionary levels as shown in the first chart below.
  • If you’re curious as to what makes up the Leading Economic Index, the second chart below shows the ten components with contribution from each.

Equity Markets

  • On November 10th, the S&P was up nearly 6%, and the Nasdaq was up 7.4%. This accounts for more than half of the return in the past two months.
  • The big jump in markets on was due to inflation coming in at 7.7% instead of 7.9%.
  • Big daily increases like this do not occur in good markets. The chart below shows the 20 largest increases in Nasdaq history.
  • 17 of the previous 19 largest daily increases occurred during major bear markets and did not mark the bottom.
  • The other 2 happened one week after the ultimate bear markets lows in 2009 and 2020 under very different conditions than we have now (VIX then was above 80, while VIX currently is at 22.)
  • Near-term, markets could continue to drift higher. Looking past the next few weeks, things appear to be very weak. Caution is advised.

Interest Rates

  • The Fed is likely to increase rates by 0.50% in December, then another 0.25% in February. The market anticipates that the Fed will stop raising rates after that.
  • Longer term rates appear to be calming down, and may be starting to price in recessionary risks.

Bottom Line

While the relative calmness has been a welcome respite from the volatility this year, we do not believe this is a time for complacency.

We would love to believe that the bear market is over. At our core, we are optimists.

But more importantly, we are realists.

Equity exposure has steadily increased in client portfolios this quarter. If market and economic conditions continue to improve, we will continue to do so.

But we view any new equity exposure as potentially having a very short shelf-life.

We will not hesitate to reduce equity exposure, increase cash levels, and do more hedging to protect portfolio values if and when these actions are warranted.

We hope you and your loved ones have a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday.

Invest wisely!

Don’t Fight the Fed

The Federal Reserve met today and increased interest rates by 0.75%, as expected.

Stock markets were volatile all day, and ended up down almost 2%. So maybe it wasn’t so expected after all.

As we have consistently said in communications over the past few months, risks are very high right now.

Today didn’t do anything to change that in either our signals or our minds.

We’ll keep it short and to the point today, and let charts do most of the talking, but let’s do a brief portfolio update first.

Portfolio Update

Client portfolios are VERY conservative.

We have continued to reduce equity exposure in all portfolios, and we have added equity hedges to portfolios as well.

If markets continue to fall, your portfolio should remain very stable. We cannot eliminate risk, so there will always be fluctuations. But we have minimized those to properly handle the current environment.

We firmly believe this to be the proper course of action at this point.

As always, markets can change. If we get signals to increase risk, we will not hesitate to do so.

Yield Curve

The Yield Curve remains inverted. This means that short-term rates are higher than longer term rates. The yield curve is more inverted than it has been in almost 50 years.

US Treasury Yield Curve is inverted

Why does the yield curve get inverted in the first place?

There are two main reasons:

  • Short-term rates are mostly set by the Fed. They have been steadily increasing rates all year.
  • Longer-term rates are set by the market. When there are concerns about economic weakness, money flows into longer-term treasury bonds.

Longer-term yields have been relatively stable the past few months, while short-term rates have risen dramatically.

Inverted Yield Curves Lead to Recessions

As we have mentioned numerous times this year, an inverted yield curve has been an excellent indicator of recessions.

The next chart shows the percentage of the yield curve that is inverted (blue line), with recessionary periods in gray.

The percentage of the yield curve that is inverted simply looks at various maturities and counts whether the short-term rate is higher than the long-term rate. (3-months vs 2-years, 3-months vs 5-years, etc.)

When more than 55% of the yield curve becomes inverted, it has ALWAYS preceded a recession. We are now at 65% of the yield curve that is inverted.

The Fed’s Dot Plot

This is a bit of a complex chart, but it shows how each member of the Federal Reserve Committee sees future interest rates.

This shows that the majority of Fed members believe they will hike rates to somewhere between 4.5% and 5.0%. The target rate is currently 3.00-3.25%. (They use a 0.25% range when setting the Fed Funds rate).

So we can assume that there is likely another 1.50-2.00% of interest rate increases to come. This would likely be another 0.75% at the next meeting in October, followed by slightly decreasing hikes (0.50% then 0.25% at the following two meetings).

Things can change, but this is a good gauge of their thoughts.

It is also interesting to note that almost every Fed member is then projecting rates to fall in 2024 and beyond.

When has the Fed Stopped Hiking Historically?

Historically, the Fed stops raising rates when the Fed Funds rate gets above the inflation rate. There may be some time to go before that happens.

Bottom Line

Today’s developments do not surprise us.

The Fed has been crystal clear about wanting to slow the economy, slow wage growth, and remove speculation from markets (meaning lower stock and home prices).

They re-emphasized that today in no uncertain terms.

The Fed wants prices to fall. Don’t fight them, you won’t win.

The downside scenarios are large enough that it still makes sense to reduce risk if you haven’t done so already.

As always, please do not hesitate to reach out with questions or to review your individual circumstance.

Invest wisely!

The Bear Market is Accelerating

Stocks had the worst day since the depths of COVID after inflation data came in higher than expected.

We’ll discuss the following in this report:

  • Market Overview
  • What is the Reason for the Decline?
  • Portfolio Updates

Let’s get to it.

Market Overview

Major stock indexes had huge losses today:

  • S&P 500 Index: Down 4.3%
  • Dow Jones: Down 3.9%
  • Nasdaq: Down 5.2%

Wow.

These are the biggest daily losses in over two years.

Bonds fell, international markets fell, commodities fell…everything was down.

This has not been a healthy market this year, and it looks to be worsening.

What is the Reason for the Decline?

The financial media is blaming inflation.

This morning, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) came in at 8.3% year-over-year, versus expectations of an 8% increase.

But do we really think the market would be up today if inflation was 7.9%? Is that 0.4% difference the real issue here?

We don’t think so.

Instead, we suggest that there is one main thing happening now: LIQUIDITY is being removed from the financial system by the Federal Reserve.

The strong rally in equity markets over the summer was based on the thought that the Fed would slow down the pace of interest rate increases.

This was wrong and illogical thinking.

The Fed has been very clear about this over the past three months.

They are actively trying to remove speculation from markets, in the attempt to reduce demand and drive down prices.

They WANT prices in the economy to fall. They WANT markets to fall. And they won’t stop until inflation is back down to 2%.

After today, there is a 100% chance that the Fed increases rates by 0.75% next week, with a 34% chance they raise a full one percent. They are not slowing down the pace of rate increases, they are increasing it.

The Fed also increased “Quantitative Tightening” this month. They are scheduled to remove almost $100 billion in liquidity from the financial markets in September alone.

The message in the 10 years after the 2008 financial crisis was “Don’t fight the Fed.” They were printing money like it was a monopoly game, with the goal of increasing asset prices to increase demand.

Now, we have the opposite environment, and the Fed is REMOVING assets from the financial system.

The natural result is decreased demand for risk assets.

But the message is still the same…don’t fight the Fed.

Portfolio Update

This year continues to be volatile, and we expect that to continue.

  1. As we shared in our video last Friday, the market is very volatile (obviously), and the outlook is uncertain. Two of our three highest probability scenarios include major declines in financial markets from here. The link to our video is below.
  2. We were already very defensively positioned in client portfolios with greatly reduced equity exposure and high cash and cash equivalent exposure. We increased cash exposure today as well.
  3. We see multiple scenarios where hedging positions will be included in client portfolios in the very near future. We also expect equity exposure to continue to be reduced from already low levels.

We discuss the following topics (followed by when they appear in the video):

  • Why the real estate market may be the best indicator to watch
  • S&P 500 Overview (4:46)
  • Similarities between now and 2008 (6:30)
  • Our top three potential market scenarios (8:15)
  • Yield Curve (12:06)
  • Commodities (13:05)

Bottom Line

This is not a time to be thinking about increasing allocations to stock. This is a time to be defensive.

This market environments could easily reverse higher, but the likelihood is that there is far more downside ahead.

We hope we are wrong. If we are, we will adjust accordingly.

In the meantime, the worst possible action is to do nothing, keeping large exposure to stocks and HOPE things get better.

Relying on hope in bear markets is the best way to make an investment mistake that could jeopardize your financial plan and your financial future.

As always, please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions.

Invest wisely.

Retiring in a Volatile Market: Control What You Can

Loving mature wife embracing husband from behind while writing in book. Happy middle aged couple making to do list of purchases and discussing future plans. Cheerful senior man working at home on wooden table with beautiful woman hugging him from behind, copy space.

Retirement during a volatile market is unsettling.

Whether you are on the cusp or have already made the leap, a market downturn’s impact on your savings will be felt now and potentially for years to come. How do you keep your plan on track and your desired lifestyle in place?

If you can’t control income, you’ll need to control expenses. And that means budgeting and taxes. You can deploy tactics and strategies to optimize these factors no matter what stage you are in on your retirement journey.

Set a Realistic Budget – And Stick to It

Lifestyle creep is real.

No matter how carefully you budget, somehow, the numbers on the spreadsheet don’t mean much when confronted with fun, deliciousness, seeing family, a quick weekend trip, or anything else. You get the idea.

A volatile market means that drawing income from investments will likely result in selling into a down market. This not only crystallizes the loss, but you may also have to sell greater amounts to make up for lower prices. This will hamper your recovery, and your assets may not grow as much over time.

Reviewing your budget to ensure you keep your spending at a level that is commensurate with your income is critical.

Plan Proactively to Reduce Taxes

Planning strategically for taxes can help you keep more of your income.

This can compensate for budget shortfalls or help you give long-term capital growth investments the time they need to recover. There are a lot of things you can do to keep yourself in the lowest possible tax bracket.

Maximize Tax-Free Social Security Income

Social security benefits have a tax-free component of at least 15%. Whether you pay taxes on the other 85% depends on your overall income level, but you can increase your tax-free income by maximizing your benefits.

Waiting until age 70 to claim increases your annual benefit by 8% for every year from your full retirement age (FRA). If you are married, it may make sense for the spouse with the highest income level to wait until age 70, while the lower-income spouse claims at early or full retirement.

Deploy an Asset Location Strategy

Asset location refers to the types of accounts where you hold investments. They are tax-deferred such as 401(k)s and IRAs, taxable brokerage accounts, and tax-free Roth accounts.

Using all the accounts together to create a tax strategy that lowers lifetime taxes is the goal. The general principle is to match the asset up to the account’s tax treatment. Stocks receive tax-favorable treatment on qualified dividends and long-term capital gains, so one option is to put them in a taxable account.

If you hold municipal bonds, they also go into a taxable account. Higher yielding corporate bonds would be held in a tax-deferred account, as the lower growth rate compared to equities will help reduce required minimum distributions, which are based on the account value.

Using the Roth IRA account as a flexible source of funds can help keep you in lower tax brackets. In years when taxable income is higher, using funds from the Roth account for living expenses can reduce income taxes and help you avoid the IRMAA Medicare Part B and Part D premium surcharge.

Take Advantage of Lower Asset Values with a Roth Conversion

The drop in value of 401(k) and IRA accounts is painful – but it also means that you can convert those assets to a tax-free Roth account with a lower tax liability.

This can set you up for a more effective asset location strategy and can help you control future income and taxes by eliminating RMDs on the assets that are converted.

The Bottom Line

Retiring in a volatile market adds a layer of complexity to all the choices you need to make.

It means emphasizing controlling your expenses, whether lifestyle or the taxes on the income you draw from retirement accounts.

The critical thing to remember is that you do have options, and you can control several important levers that can help you keep your retirement plans intact.

This work is powered by Advisor I/O under the Terms of Service and may be a derivative of the original. The information contained herein is intended to be used for educational purposes only and is not exhaustive. Diversification and/or any strategy that may be discussed does not guarantee against investment losses but are intended to help manage risk and return. If applicable, historical discussions and/or opinions are not predictive of future events. The content is presented in good faith and has been drawn from sources believed to be reliable. The content is not intended to be legal, tax or financial advice. Please consult a legal, tax or financial professional for information specific to your individual situation.

A Recession or Not a Recession, That is the Question

“To be or not to be–that is the question: Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune or to take arms against a sea of trouble and by opposing end them.”

hamlet, act 3, scene 1

July was a nice month in the markets.

Which begs the question…have we seen the lows in this bear market?

Should we expect markets to continue to rise and suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune? Or is this yet another fake-out like we’ve seen twice already this year and we go back into a sea of trouble?

The answer? It depends.

In most environments, it “depends” on a complex series of data points could shape the direction of the markets.

However, today’s environment seems more simple on the surface.

It depends primarily on only one variable: whether we are in a recession or not.

The reason is very simple…markets respond differently to pullbacks similar to what we’ve seen this year based solely on if it happens during a recession or not.

Let’s look at some historical context.

S&P 500 Performance: Recession vs No Recession

Markets can decline without the economy being in a recession. Since 2009, we’ve seen this happen a few different times:

  • 2011: US Debt Downgrade
  • 2016: Chinese Yuan Devaluation and Oil Crash
  • 2018: Random 20% decline in the 4th quarter

Each of these times, markets fell roughly 20%.

And each of these times, markets recovered losses within 18-24 months.

But there was no recession during these periods.

Our first chart below, courtesy of Ned Davis Research, shows this dynamic. The chart shows declines of at least 18% and separates it between two categories: whether it occurred during a recession or not.

The black line is the performance of the S&P 500 when there was no recession, while the blue dotted line shows the performance if there was an official recession.

We are currently two months past the recent lows, as indicated by the red dashed line.

Based on what the market has done historically, the results are very clear: if we’re not in a recession, we should expect the next 12 months to be pretty good. If we are in a recession, we should expect more volatility and a retest of the lows.

Which begs the question…are we in a recession or not?

Are We in a Recession?

Normally, determining a recession is pretty straight-forward: it is two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth.

Both Q1 and Q2 this year were negative.

So by historical definitions, yes, we are in a recession.

But it may not be quite that simple this time.

We don’t like to get political in these reports, because the world focuses way too much on the self-absorbed, sociopathic political class.

But with mid-term elections around the corner, the incumbents are trying to change the definition of a recession.

It’s an overly transparent pre-election tactic. But we will reluctantly admit that in this case, they may have a point.

(To be fair to our politician friends, many economists agree that the first quarter did not resemble a typical economic recession.)

Let’s look at the data.

The first quarter GDP came in at a negative 1.4%, mostly because of two things:

  • Defense spending fell 8.5%
  • A trade imbalance due to a strengthening US dollar resulted in a negative 3.2% from total GDP.

Remove these two factors, and GDP is positive. In fact, if you simply remove the trade imbalance, GDP is positive.

Economic data in the first quarter was fairly positive as well, led by consumer spending, which was up 2.7%.

While the first quarter showed relatively good economic data, the second quarter was recessionary without question.

Second quarter GDP was negative 0.9%. And the negativity was more widespread.

  • Inventory investment decreased 2.0%
  • Housing investments decreased 0.7%
  • Federal and State spending both decreased slightly
  • Business investment decreased 0.1%
  • Consumer spending rose by a more moderate 0.7% (down from 2.7% in Q1)

With the underlying strength in the first quarter, it’s not out of bounds to assume that we’ve only seen one quarter of truly negative GDP growth.

(For the record, we don’t think we should change the traditional definition of a recession, but we should always put GDP data in context, both positive and negative.)

Which makes the current quarter especially important.

If we have negative GDP this quarter, there is no question that we are in a recession. The question then becomes how bad it is and how long it lasts.

Atlanta Fed GDPNow

One way to keep track of current GDP estimates is through the Atlanta Fed’s “GDPNow” tracker. (You can view the site HERE.)

As of Thursday, August 4th, they are projecting a 1.4% GDP for Q3, as shown in the next chart.

Granted, the estimate has steadily declined since the start of the quarter, and we still have almost 2/3 of the quarter left. So anything can happen.

And this data is also based on human estimates, which can be skewed.

But it should at least give us some hope that maybe we don’t see a formal recession this year. And if we do see one, it would likely be fairly mild.

This morning’s jobs report adds to the hope that we may not be in a recession just yet. The economy added 528,000 new jobs this quarter, and as of July has officially recovered the number of jobs lost during COVID.

However, we shouldn’t get too complacent at this point.

While GDPNow is showing positive estimates for current GDP, there are huge warning signs right now that should give us cause for concern.

Inverted Yield Curve

Historically, one of the best recession indicators has been an inverted yield curve. This occurs when the 10-year yield on US Treasuries are LOWER than the 2-year yields.

The next chart, courtesy of Bloomberg, shows this inversion.

When the line goes below zero, the curve is inverted.

Right now, it is more inverted than at any time since Paul Volker started fighting inflation the early 1980’s.

It is more negative than COVID, than the global financial crisis, the tech bubble, and various recessions during the 80’s and 90’s.

We strongly believe that it is imprudent to ignore this data point.

But this data point isn’t a very good timing indicator of when a recession may happen.

In reality, it is when the curve starts to steepen AFTER it has been inverted that is a better indicator that a recession is imminent, and we haven’t seen that happen yet.

Housing Market Concerns

While the inverted yield curve is a bit more theoretical in nature, there are real economic data points that are showing signs of stress.

The housing market plays a huge part in economic activity, accounting for 15-18% of US economic activity on average.

Leading indicators in the housing market are showing reason to be concerned.

One of these is cancellation rates, as shown in the next chart from Redfin.

Cancellations happen when an accepted offer is withdrawn by either party.

In this case, the majority of cancellations are due to buyers backing out.

There are legitimate reasons for this happening:

  • Mortgage rates have increased, making it unaffordable for a buyer to proceed;
  • Property taxes have been reassessed higher, increasing the cost of housing;
  • People anticipating that prices may fall, causing buyers to withdraw offers.

Here’s a link to the article discussing cancellations:

The Deal Is Off: Home Sales Are Getting Canceled at the Highest Rate Since the Start of the Pandemic

Another reason for cancellations is a drop in consumer confidence, which has a big effect on economic conditions in the US.

Consumer Confidence

While the housing market is a large part of the economy, the consumer as a whole is much more important. Approximately 70% of the US economy is driven by the consumer in one way or another (this includes housing).

So when consumer confidence slows, economic activity typically slows along with it.

And the consumer is in the dumps right now, as shown in our next chart.

Right now, the consumer is the least confident they have been at any time in the past 60 years. This includes the Vietnam era, the inflation of the 1970’s, the tech crash, the global financial crisis, and COVID.

That is concerning.

But what does all of this tell us about the near-term direction of the market?

S&P 500 Index

All of the data listed above is not news to the market.

Despite these concerning data points, markets have rallied over the past seven weeks.

But the move higher since June looks almost identical to the one in March, as shown in the chart below.

Specifically, the pattern is a three-leg move higher into previous highs.

There was an initial leg higher, a move lower of roughly the same timeframe, then an extended move higher in both time and price.

The move in March followed the Ukraine invasion.

The move in June really didn’t have any catalyst, other than the overall market being incredibly pessimistic.

In addition to the S&P 500, nearly every major US stock index looks identical.

The next chart shows the S&P 500, the Russell 2000 small cap index, the Nasdaq Composite and the S&P Mid Cap index.

Every one of these indices are at the same resistance level. This means that the market thinks these levels are important.

Regardless of the reason for the move in June, it has been strong. Earnings reports have been more positive than expected, and the market is starting to predict that the Fed will become more accommodative and “pivot” by slowing the rise of interest rates.

If the market is going to do it’s own pivot and head back lower, it must do so very quickly.

If it breaks above this resistance area, then we can begin increasing equity exposure in client portfolios, at least for a period of time.

If it heads lower, then we should expect a fairly quick move to test the lows from June.

Bottom Line

While a big consideration for the market is the current recession debate, markets are extremely complex systems. Relying on only one data point for decision-making would be foolish.

When looking at a variety of data points, it truly is a mixed bag out right now.

Recent market strength and earnings reports have been mostly positive. As such, the market seems to believe the Fed will slow down the pace of interest rate increases. (Frankly, this expectation seems to be unwarranted, especially after today’s employment numbers.)

For now, the move higher over the summer appears to be a typical bear market rally. As such, we have been intentionally slow to add equity exposure.

Why?

Mainly because there is still plenty of upside if the market wants to keep pushing higher. For example, the Nasdaq is down nearly 23% this year, even after a big rally over the summer.

And big stocks like Google, Microsoft, Facebook and Netflix still have massive upside potential at current levels.

If the market can get above the levels noted in the S&P chart above, there starts to be more proof that this rally may be more than just another temporary rally.

But if we do go into a recession, all bets are off. And there are many indications to suggest we are headed in that direction.

Bottom line is that we believe it is prudent to underweight risk right now, given the massive uncertainties in the market and the economy.

Invest wisely!

Gimme Shelter

A Directional Sign in Front of Storm Clouds indicating the Storm Evacuation Route. Arrow on sign is directing to the right.

Ooh, see the fire is sweepin’
Our streets today
Burns like a red coal carpet
Mad bull lost its way

– Rolling Stones, “Gimme Shelter”

The mad bull has lost its way.

And an historically volatile year is getting worse.

Last week it appeared that the market may have saved itself from more volatility.

But out-of-control inflation numbers once again show that this environment is anywhere from over.

In fact, it’s getting worse.

We don’t say this lightly, but the risk of a major market melt-down is extremely high right now.

The way the market structure looks right now is concerning.

Here are four of our major concerns:

  1. The Fed wants to reduce inflation, despite the consequences to the market or the economy.
  2. The bond market is cratering.
  3. Positioning in the market still remains bullish, despite very bearish sentiment.
  4. Patterns within the market are mirroring previous major declines.

We’ll briefly discuss each of the above, but let’s talk about portfolio positioning first.

Portfolio Update

Two weeks ago, the market rallied, and caused us to add measured equity exposure to portfolios.

As of today, all of that increase has been reversed, and equity exposure is now lower than it was three weeks ago.

Overall, we are extremely underweight exposure to stocks. And we expect that to be reduced throughout the week as well.

The next chart shows how your equity exposure looks relative to the maximum amount of equity you could potentially have in your portfolio.

The remaining balance is in cash and short-term fixed income.

NOTE: When we say “cash”, we are referring to cash and cash equivalent ETFs in your account. The following tickers are considered either cash equivalents or short-term fixed income, with very little volatility: FTSM, BIL, GSY, RAVI, SHV and PSDYX.

By the end of this week, it may make sense to use inverse ETFs to hedge equity exposure for a short period of time, while holding certain positions that are still showing favorable risk/reward metrics. (We did this during the COVID crash in March of 2020, and it proved to be a very effective risk management tool.)

So while we have already reduced your equity exposure dramatically, it could get even lower as the week goes on.

As always, please reach out to us directly with any questions.

The Fed

The Fed meets this Wednesday.

They are in a bind.

Earlier today, the market was projecting a 72% probability of a 0.50% rate hike, with a 28% probability of a 0.75% hike.

However, after the market, the Fed apparently leaked data suggesting they would do a 0.75% hike instead.

Probabilities immediately rose, and the market is now projecting a 93% chance of a 0.75% hike on Wednesday. All in the matter of a couple hours.

The next chart shows the probability earlier today, courtesy of the CME group. Click on the chart to be taken to their website. The bar on the left is the probability of a 50 bps rate hike, and the one on the right is for 75 bps.

And here are the probabilities now…

Just over a week ago, the probability of a 0.75% rate hike was only 3%. So in a few short days, the Fed changed their mind.

They have a fundamental choice to make: do they crash the markets and economy and reduce inflation, or do they blink and let inflation get further out of control?

It seems pretty clear which approach they want to take: fight inflation and the markets be damned.

Frankly, they are sleeping in the bed they made.

They let the bull market get crazy, and now the mad bull has lost its way.

The Bond Market

Bonds typically are a hiding place during volatility.

But when the Fed is raising rates, bonds have had more volatility than stocks.

In fact, long-term US treasury bonds are down over 58% over the past two years, as shows in the next chart.

This is not a sign of a healthy environment.

Positioning versus Sentiment

One of the things we’ve been watching as a positive for asset prices is sentiment.

Sentiment is a contrary indicator.

When sentiment is extremely positive, market prices can be near a top.

Conversely, when sentiment is extremely negative, like it is now, it can be a sign that a low in prices are near.

However, new data has come out showing positioning by investors.

And what is shows is that what people are saying versus what they are doing is very different.

The next chart, courtesy of All-Star Charts, shows this variance.

The orange line is positioning. This shows the current allocation to stocks by a survey from the AAII (American Association of Individual Investors).

The blue line is sentiment. It shows the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment readings.

Previously, there has been a very strong correlation between the two.

Now, this correlation has broken down completely.

This suggests one of two things:

  1. Consumers are overly pessimistic, and will ride out this storm.
  2. Investors are overly allocated to stocks, and a massive shift out of equities is about to occur.

Our guess is that the second scenario is the likely outcome.

Market Patterns are Similar to Previous Major Bear Markets

First of all, every decline is unique. We do not use this type of analysis in our day-to-day investment management process.

But it is interesting just how closely the current market environment resembles major bear markets from the past.

The final chart, from Nautilus research, shows how the current environment compares to other major bear markets in 1937, 1973, 2000 and 2008.

(Our apologies for the small print…click to view a larger version.)

The correlation of the current market to each of these previous bears is very high.

In fact, the current market has over a 90% correlation with each of these environments.

Again, we don’t have any direct inputs based on analysis like this, but it does suggest that the overall pattern is similar to other major tops. And we should be aware of these types of correlations.

Bottom Line

We were hoping the volatility was over, and that the extremes in sentiment that we have seen recently were going to be good signs of an impending low.

However, our concerns now are “how much further can this fall”?

We wish we knew.

The bottom could have happened today. We doubt it, but it could have.

However, the bottom may very well be much, much lower from here.

And we’re not going to wait around to see what happens. We’re not going to HOPE things change. We’re not going to stand by and let an out-of-control market destroy your hard-earned capital.

We are going to ACT. We have already taken major steps to reduce risk, and are prepared to take even more as warranted.

We’re in a time of MAJOR risk for markets.

Today felt a little panicky. Our guess is that it starts to feel much more panicky in the coming weeks and months.

If we are wrong, we will gladly admit it and add equity exposure back into your portfolio.

But if we are right, we will help you avoid what is potentially one of the largest bear markets in history.

When the mad bull finds its way again, we’ll be prepared.

But in the meantime, we’d rather protect your portfolio than stand by and watch it fall.

Invest wisely!